uqq /46-/J^zmT r^s Amphibian and Reptile Survey of the Bureau of Land Management Miles City District, Montana A Report to: Bureau of Land Management Miles City Field Office 1 1 1 Garryowen Road Miles City, MT 59301 and Billings Field Office 810 East Main Billings, MT 59105-3395 Submitted by: Paul Hendricks February 1999 Montana Natural Heritage Program 1515 East Sixth Avenue Helena, MT 59620-1800 597.9 NllARSBLMMC 1999 1 & fvojrt-b^ A, ' Montana Stale Library l|iiiiiiiiii|i 'III iiii|iii|i|iiM|ni|i|iiiii!|iii|| 3 0864 1004 7130 2 oi. oansei © 1999 Montana Natural Heritage Program This document should be cited as follows: Hendncks. P. 1999. Amphibian and Reptile Surve> of the Bureau of Land Management Miles Cit> Distnct. Montana. Montana Natural Hentage Program. Helena. MT. 80 pp. ABSTRACT During 1995 and 1998, a total of 1 10 site surveys for amphibians and reptiles were conducted by Montana Natural Heritage Program biologists in the Bureau of Land Management Miles City District (the former Billings, Big Dry and Powder River Resource Areas) in eastern Montana. During the 1998 contract period, 102 site surveys were conducted (8 of these were nocturnal roadside call surveys, 94 were standard surveys) during April to July All surveys were conducted by one individual. Surveys took from 5 to 180 minutes (mean = 58.5 min) and consisted of a thorough search of the wetland perimeter in combination with netting of near shore aquatic habitats for adults, eggs, larvae, and tadpoles Sampling was done by hand and dipnet At seeps, rocks and logs were overturned in and near wet areas to expose hidden individuals In addition to site surveys, observations of road kills were recorded, as were fortuitous sightings by those conducting the surveys or other reliable individuals. Ten species (6 amphibian and 4 reptile) were detected within the Miles City District area during 1998 site surveys. Species included: Tiger Salamander (Amhystoma tigrmum), Woodhouse's Toad {Bufo wuodhousii). Great Plains Toad {Bufo cogna(us). Western Chorus Frog {Pseudacris triseriata). Plains Spadefoot {Spea bombifrons). Northern Leopard Frog {Rana pipiens). Painted Turtle {Chrysemys picta). Racer {Coluber constrictor). Plains Garter Snake (Thamnophis radix), and Common Garter Snake (Tfiamnophis sirtalis). Four reptile species encountered in 1998 other than on site surveys include Smooth Green Snake (Liochlorophis vernalis). Gopher Snake {Fituophis catemfer). Western Hognose Snake (Heterodon nasicus), and Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis). In addition. Short-homed Lizard {Phrynosoma hernandezi). Sagebrush Lizard {Sceloporiis graciosus), and Western Terrestrial Garter Snake {lliamnophis elegans) were reported from the Miles City District by other observers in 1998. In 1995, 3 species were detected during 8 site surveys in Carbon County: Tiger Salamander, Western Chorus Frog, and Plains Spadefoot. Short-horned Lizard, Sagebrush Lizard, Gopher Snake, and Western Rattlesnake were also encountered, but not during surveys. Of the 1998 surveys, 95. 1% had one or more amphibian or reptile species present. Western Chorus Frog, Northern Leopard Frog, and Plains Garter Snake were the most frequently encountered species in 1998, being recorded on 67.6%, 61.7%, and 22.3%, respectively, of the site surveys. Species with records from the Miles City District area, but not encountered during the 1995 and 1998 surveys, include Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Common Snapping Turtle (Che/ydra serpentina). Spiny Softshell (I rionys spini/erns), and Milk Snake (Lampropeltis tnangulum). Western Toad {Bufo boreas), Columbia Spotted Frog {Rana luteiventris), and Rubber Boa {Charina hottae), all with montane affinities, have been documented but are marginal to the Miles City District in the west. The Canadian Toad {Bufo hemiophrys), although recorded from the Miles City District area in 1966, is now considered historical (not reported in >30 years). Wood Frog {Rana sylvatica) might be documented eventually from the Miles City District area in the Big Horn Mountains of Big Horn County. ACKNOUTEDGMENTS I thank Kirv\'in Werner and Bryce Maxell for help conducting site surveys, Martin Miller for data entry, John Hinshaw for data retrieval, and Cedron Jones for mapping occurrences. Thanks also to Dale Tribby (Miles City Field Office, BLM) and Jay Parks (Billings Field Office, BLM) for their interest and support with this project, and their efforts to coordinate identification of survey sites. Ted Nordhagen of Westby kindly acquired the Smooth Green Snake specimens. Financial support for the project came from a Challenge Cost-Share agreement between the Bureau of Land Management and the Montana Natural Heritage Program (Montana State Librar>', Natural Resources Information System and The Nature Conservancy). Funds for additional survey work on National Wildlife Refiige and Waterfowl Production Area lands within the Miles City District, BLM region were provided from an additional Challenge Cost-Share agreement with the Montana Office of the USFWS. Museum records were received from; American Museum of Natural History, Academy of Natural Science, Brigham Young University, California Academy of Science, Carnegie Museum, University of Puget Sound Museum, Field Museum of Natural Histon*', Glacier National Park Museum. Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Kansas, Los Angeles County Museum, Louisiana State University Museum of Zoolog\', Museum of Comparati\e Zoology - Harvard, Milwaukee Public Museum, Montana State Uni\ersity Museum, Michigan State University Museum, North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Northern Louisiana University Museum, University of Colorado Museum, University of Georgia Museum of Natural History, University of Idaho Museum, University of Michigan Museum, University of South Dakota, United States National Museum of Natural Histor>', University of Texas - Arlington, University of Texas - El Paso, and Peabody Museum - Yale Most museum data were received with the help of Dr. Charles Peterson, Idaho State University, Pocatello. Jim Reichel. former MTN^HP Zoologist, was instrumental in organizing and conducting a series of amphibian and reptile inventories across Montana, the first comprehensive coverage of the state in three decades, and by far the most uniform and complete. Jim"s untimely death in 1997 prevented his direct involvement in completing this portion of the overall project. This report represents one of a series of regional inventories that contribute to a baseline survey of the entire state. IV INTRODUCTION Populations of several amphibian species are currently declining in the western U.S. and elsewhere around the world. Acid rain, ozone depletion, pollution by toxic chemicals and heavy metals, predation and/or competition by exotic species, habitat alteration, climatic changes, disease, immune system problems, and combinations of several of these factors have all been suggested as possible causes (Com and Fogelman 1984, Phillips 1990, Yoflfe 1992) Recognition of these alarming population trends has renewed interest in the status amphibian populations in particular, and raised awareness regarding current ignorance of the status of many reptile species as well. The amphibians and reptiles occupying the plains of eastern Montana have received scant attention by naturalists and biologists. As a consequence, we know very little about the status, population trends, habitat requirements, and reproductive biology of many species within this region of the state. With new information acquired in the last 5 years from a series of regional inventories of the herpetofauna in eastern Montana (e.g., Reichel 1995b, Hendricks and Reichel 1996, Hendricks and Reichel 1998, Roedel and Hendricks 1998), we are gaining an understanding of abundance and population trends for several species, and are "fleshing out" known distributions that were largely based on opportunistic encounters and other data at least half a century old. In 1805-1806 Lewis and Clark were the first to document the presence of Spiny Softshell (Triofiyx spiniferus), Eastern Short-horned Lizard {Phiynosoma hernandezi). Western Hognose Snake {Heterodon tiasicus). Western Terrestrial Garter Snake {Thanniophis elegans), and Western Rattlesnake {Crotalis vindts) along the Missouri River in present-day eastern Montana (Burroughs 1995). Most additional published accounts of amphibians and reptiles in eastern Montana are concentrated along the Missouri River corridor and its tributaries. Notable among these reports is that of Cope (1879), who commented on the occurrence of 5 amphibian and 3 reptile species between the Judith River and Armells Creek. More recently, Mosimann and Rabb (1952) documented the presence of 4 amphibian and 7 reptile species in the Tiber Reservoir area along the Marias River of northcentral Montana. The written record of exploration of Montana in the 19"' century and first half of the 20^ century, and unpublished museum collection records, provide the base for analyses of historical distributions and population trends. Additional distribution and status information for border regions can be gleaned from Wheeler and Wheeler (1966) for North Dakota, Visher (1914) for South Dakota, Baxter and Stone (1985) for Wyoming, and Secoy and Vincent (1976) for Saskatchewan. Preliminary data gathered from site surveys and revisits to historical sites indicate that the Northern Leopard Frog {Rana pipiens) has disappeared over much of its former range in western Montana (Werner et al. 1998) and is declining in at least some areas of eastern Montana. Status and population trend of several toad species {Bufo spp.) are unknown, although declines of the Western Toad (Bufo hureas) have recently been reported in northern Idaho (C. Peterson pers. comm), northwestern Montana (Werner and Reichel 1994, Werner et al. 1998), Yellowstone National Park (Koch and Peterson 1995) and Colorado (Carey 1993). Land-use practices, such as large-scale logging, continue to be detrimental to resident amphibians 1 in some regions of the western U.S. (Buryetal. 1991). The impacts of grazing on amphibians and reptiles and their habitats remain poorly studied and understood. Heavy grazing in and around breeding sites associated with water may negatively impact amphibians and reptiles by 1 ) eliminating emergent vegetation necessary for egg and larval survival, 2) lowering water quality, especially causing high siltation levels, 3) trampling of eggs, larvae and adults, and 4) degrading the amphibian and reptile food base. Additionally, modification of seeps and springs for livestock watering, by capturing water flow in tanks, may make former breeding sites unusable by amphibians. Inventory of the Miles City District, BLM was undertaken to survey for amphibian and reptile species in a large region of eastern Montana for which there are only rudimentarv data on the status and distribution of most species. Several historical Northern Leopard Frog sites were also visited to determine if this species was still present. Concurrent with site surveys, a variety of data on the physical characteristics of each site was recorded; these data help identify habitat needs of selected species. Management suggestions are presented that pertain to habitat enhancement for selected species. Limitations in current knowledge and future information needs are also addressed. The Montana Natural Heritage Program currently (1998) lists five amphibian and five reptile species as Animal Species of Special Concern. Of these, two amphibian and five reptile species have been documented within the borders of the Miles City District, BLM. They are Canadian Toad (Biifo hemiophrys). Northern Leopard Frog {Rana pipiens). Common Snapping Turtle {Chelydra serpentina). Spiny Softshell {Thonyx spmiferiis). Western Hognose Snake {Heterodon nasicus). Milk Snake (Lampropeltis thangulum), and Smooth Green Snake (Liochlorophis [=Opheodns] vemalis). The toad, two turtle species, and Milk Snake are also listed as BLM Special Status Species for Montana and the Dakotas. STUDY AREA AND METHODS The BLM's Miles City District (comprised of the former Billings, Big Dry, and Powder River Resource Areas) was surveyed during the 1998 inventory, portions of the Billings Resource Area in Carbon County were surveyed in 1995, and those data are included in this report. The area bounded by the Miles City District is huge, stretching from near Yellowstone National Park in the southwest to Saskatchewan in the northeast, and bordered by North Dakota and South Dakota to the east, and Wyoming to the south. Land cover of the District is mostly agricuhural lands, grasslands, or shrublands, with scattered pine forests in the south, and riparian gallery forest and other riparian types along major drainages, such as the Missouri and Yellowstone rivers and their tributanes. Elevation is generally below 5000 ft (1500 m), but the southwestern comer of the Miles City District encompasses several mountain uplifts (such as the Big Horn, Pryor, and Beartooth mountians). Historical records from museum collections can be very useful in determining long-term changes in populations or shifts in biodiversity (Shaffer et al. 1998). Historical locations of amphibians and reptiles were recorded from the literature (see Bibliography) and museum specimen records. Records were received ft-om over 20 major North American museums that have computerized their collection records (see Acknowledgments). Locations derived from these sources have been entered into a database and digitized. Distribution maps were created using survey and sighting data and historical records, including museum specimens. Survey sites were chosen based on 3 criteria; 1) high priority sites as determined by the BLM; 2) location of streams, seeps and wetlands on topographic maps; and 3) accessibility of the wetlands by roads. Based on the above, 3-6 sites were chosen daily for surveys. From five minutes to 3 hours were spent at each site (mean = 58.5 minutes), depending upon the size of the area and what was found. Initially, the entire shoreline, or a major part thereof, was searched by walking slowly along the edge and up into the surrounding vegetation, including rolling over rocks and logs. At regular intervals, the aquatic habitat was sampled for tadpoles or larvae using dipnets. If the initial sampling showed amphibian/reptile species present, ftirther eftbrt was expended in order to get a more comprehensive view of abundance and distribution. An attempt was made to capture at least the first few individuals of a species seen at a survey site. The species name was recorded along with developmental stage and sex (if possible), the animals were then released. On occasion, representative samples of the more common species in an area were preserved for permanent museum records and will be deposited at the Idaho State University Museum. Water temperature, air temperature, and a general description of the area were recorded Standardized data sheets were used during this project, the amphibian survey data sheet was developed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and is used extensively by a variety of researchers in the western U.S. Much site-specific data was gathered during these surveys; not all data has been analyzed or is presented in this report, but is available from the Montana Natural Heritage Program. o >• t;; ^ £ ^ ° 5 2 •^ - g ^ S ^ CO CT> X :i ^ M >. 0) (0 > > 1- (U 3 > CO (0 O) in oo LO O) O) 0) C3i O) T- Ol o 9 OS CD +-• •c s o» 5 '- 3 o ■ 1 1 U. 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION General Summary A total of 102 sites was surveyed during the months of April (22 surveys). May (32 surveys), June (34 surveys), and July (14 surveys) in 1998 (see Appendix 1). Eight of the 1998 surveys were roadside nocturnal call surveys, rather than the standard site surveys. Eight additional sites (3 in June, 5 in July) were surveyed on BLM lands in Carbon County in 1995 (see Appendix 3a). Of the total 110 sites, 100 (90.9%) had one or more amphibian or reptile species present (Appendix 2 and 3b). During the 1995 surveys, 3 of the 8 sites (37.5%) had one or more amphibian species present; in 1998, 97 (95. 1%) of 102 surveys had one or more amphibian and/or reptile species present. Localized areas across the entire region were covered in the inventory. Although no species were found at 10 sites, their absence may have been due to the time of day, weather conditions, or other factors at the time of sampling. Ten species (6 amphibian, 4 reptile) were detected during site surveys within the Miles City District, BLM (Table 1). Two amphibian species (Boreal Chorus Frog, Pseudacris triseriala, and Northern Leopard Frog, Rana pipiens) were the most abundant (detected at > 50% of all site surveys) and widespread, while the Plains Garter Snake (Thamnophis radix) was the most abundant and widespread reptile species (detected at > 20% of all site surveys). TABLE 1 . Amphibian and reptile species detected during site surveys on the Miles City District, BLM: 1995 - Carbon County only (Appendix 3a), 1998 - all other counties (Appendix 1). SPECIES* PRESENCE: # OF 1998 SURVEYS (94) PERCENT OF 1998 SURVEYS PRESENCE: # OF 1995 SURVEYS (8) PERCENT OF 1995 SURVEYS AMTI 12 12.8 3 37.5 BUWO 10 10.6 0.0 BUCO 6 6.4 0.0 pstr' 69 67.6 1 12.5 SPBO 1 1.1 3 37.5 RAPI 58 61.7 0.0 CHPI 13 13.8 0.0 COCO 4 4.3 0.0 THRA 21 22.3 0.0 THSI 1 1.1 0.0 *ANfri (Ambystoma ligrinum). BUWO (Bufo woodhousti). BOCO (Bufo cognatus), PSTR (Pseudacris triseriala), SPBO (Spea bomhifrons). RAPI (Rana pipiens). CHPI (Chrysemys picla), COCO (Coluber constrictor). THRA (Thamnophis radix), THSI (Thamnophis sirtalis). ' Numbers are based on 102 total site surveys in 1998, which includes 8 roadside nocturnal call surveys unique for this species. Survey time at sites ranged from 5 to 180 minutes during 1998 (Appendix 2; mean = 58.5 min., sum = 5,965 min), and from 5 to 40 minutes in 1995 (Appendix 3b: mean = 18.8 min., sum = 150 min.). Site survey results tended to support the general observation that emergent vegetation is needed by breeding amphibians. In 1998, amphibians were detected at 14 of 15 sites (93.3%) and 71 of 74 sites (95.9%) with some emergent vegetation present (values are for shoreline emergence of 1- 25% and >50%, respectively). Unfortunately, the number of sites with no recorded emergent vegetation was small (4 sites), but amphibians were detected at only 2 (50%) of these. Emergent vegetation provides cover and predator protection for tadpoles, and material upon which eggs can be attached. Water levels are often below the level of emergent vegetation (usually a band of sedges or rushes) at ponds lacking emergent vegetation but with amphibian tadpoles present, suggesting that emergent vegetation was probably present at the time of egg laying. There were 76 opportunistic sightings of 1 1 species (3 amphibians and 8 reptiles) made by MTNHP personnel during the inventory: 26 sightings of 6 species in 1995 in Carbon County, and 50 sightings of 9 species in 1998 in all other counties (Appendix 4). Of the total for both years, 6 of the reptile species were not reported during any of the site surveys. These species include Short-horned Lizard {Phiynosoma hernandezi [=doiiglasi]). Sagebrush Lizard {Sceloporus graciosus). Smooth Green Snake {Liochlorophis [=Opheodrys\ vernalis). Gopher Snake {Pitiiophis catemfer). Western Hognose Snake {Heterodon nasicus), and Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus vihdis). More details regarding status, distribution, timing of reproduction, and period of surface activity during the 1998 inventory are presented in the species accounts that follow. Montana Natural Heritage Program Global (G) and State (S) rank codes range from 1 (critically imperiled) to 5 (demonstrably secure, though possibly rare in parts of its range). A question mark (*]*) indicates that the assigned rank is uncertain. F H- 3 •4-' () o c 'k- to c I— ■M a) O) CO o> o +-» h CD v^ to ^ T— 03 > E o -J CD LO (U ■t-> CO CO o^ O > 0) 1 — E i < m m "O c ^ to o o ■o o u- u> ID o (J 0) y r» a> o o O) o 0) O) E 1 O) 3 00 in 0) m O) 1 « en O) _) »- »- Q. • ► ^■^ E S o s 2 I ■§ I Species known to be present within the Miles City District, BLM Tiger Salamander {Ambystoma tigrmum) Description; Adults have a smooth moist skin without scales and the color pattern is highly variable; usually the background color is dark, with lighter blotches of yellow, tan or green The aduh is large and heavy-bodied with a snout-vent length of 3-6" Adult Tiger Salamanders can be separated from other Montana species by; 1) their large sized and heavy body; and 2) two prominent tubercles on the bottom of each hind foot. Eggs and Lan'ae: Egg masses are typically laid in small clusters of 5-120, but may be laid singly (Nussbaum et al. 1983, Leonard et al. 1993). They are usually attached to vegetation and placed 2"-10" below the surface of the water (Hammerson 1982a) Larval Tiger Salamanders are typically pale green or brown-colored, though those living in bentonite clay ponds may be nearly white. They are found in lakes and ponds, have external gills, and are relatively large (0.75-4" snout-vent) and heavy-bodied. Similar species; None in the Miles City District. Habitat and Habits; Tiger Salamanders in eastern Montana are primarily associated with prairie or agricultural habitats. On the Sioux and Ashland Districts, Custer National Forest they are also found in wooded draws and ponderosa pine forests (Reichel 1995b, Hendricks and Reichel 1996). They breed in ponds or lakes, usually those without fish present. In arid areas, they may also be found in springs, intermittent streams, and stock ponds. Adults spend much of the day in rodent burrows, becoming active on the surface at night. Larvae were found in ponds from 24 April to 24 July in 1998. Adults may be active relatively late in the year (a Carbon County aduh was captured well away fi'om open water on 25 September 1995). Surveying; Larvae and eggs may be seen in ponds during the day and may be sampled with a dipnet. Migrations of hundreds or thousands of newly transformed adults are occasionally seen in mid-late summer or early fall. During the breeding season, adults are often seen moving to or away from the water or breeding in it. Pitfall and minnow traps may be used to capture adults at this time. In 1995 an adult was captured in a pitfall can trap set for shrews (Appendix 4). Throughout the rest of the summer aduUs are difficult to find, using pitfall traps or driving roads on warm rainy nights may be the best techniques then Status; The only salamander in eastern Montana. The species is widespread and probably more abundant than the survey results indicate. On the Miles City District, this species was detected in 6 counties on 12.8% of the 1998 standard surveys and 37.5% of the 1995 Carbon County surveys (Table 1, Appendix 2 and 3b). This species should be considered common on the Pvliles City District. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank; G5 S5. "tr -^T o o CO c g CO > 0) CO O O ■D O O (0 ■t-< —J V) 00 en I LO M CD C T3 c 09 £: m o i* o "O a. U) V o u o 0) OB r^ d) o ■H o o> o « o (D en 1 LO CJ) O) E 3 0» oo in r— 0) '" 3 a> CJ) 1 0) o B 05 CJ) 3 Z Q. ■ 5 C • c • ► <1 - V • u. o Woodhouse's Toad {Bufo Moodhousii) Description: Adults have dry skin vvitli small warts, and are gray, brown, or olive-green with paler mottling or spots. A prominent white or yellowish line runs down the center of the back; very young transformed toads typically lack the dorsal line, and the warts are often red- brown in color. It has parallel cranial crests between the eyes and post-orbital crests connecting to them at a right angle behind the eyes: the post-orbital crests typically touch the parotoid glands If a lump-like boss is present on the snout, it does not extend back between the eyes. The pupils are horizontal. The adult has two black tubercles on the hind feet and a body length of 2.5-4". Eggs and Tadpoles: Tadpoles are typically jet black. Eggs are laid in long, clear double stings, each egg with a black center. Similar species; Western Toad lacks cranial crests. Great Plains Toad has large, white-bordered, dark, dorsal blotches. The Canadian Toad has a lump between the eyes; frequently the parotoid gland is separated from post-orbital crest and post-orbital crest broken or absent. NOTE: It is ver\- difficult to distinguish among the four Montana toad species in recently transformed toadlets. Habitat and Habits: Adults are partially terrestrial but often found near water. They are usually found in irrigated agricultural areas and floodplains, versus the upland areas used by Great Plains Toads (Bragg 1940, Timkin and Dunlap 1965, Black 1970). They are most active at night, although they may at times be found out feeding during the day (Hammerson 1982a). They typically breed in permanent lakes, ponds, reservoirs, and slow streams, with a preference for shallow areas with mud bottoms (Black 1970, Hammerson 1982a, Baxter and Stone 1985). Breeding and egg laying is spread out over the spring and early summer. In 1998 on the Miles City District, BLM, adults were observed between 28 April and 23 July, tadpoles were observed from 2 June - 24 July. Surveying: Adults may easily be found by using their loud calls for identification on warm (>54 F) nights; calhng peaks during the first few hours after sunset (Hammerson 1982a). "Road hunting" on warm nights may also be effective. Eggs and tadpoles are seen in ponds and soulghs during the day and can be sampled with a dipnet, however, identification of toad eggs and tadpoles is diflficuh or impossible in the field. Status: This species was found on 10 surveys in 5 counties in 1998 (Appendix 2). Woodhouse's Toad is relatively common in eastern Montana east of the island mountain ranges, although status and distribution north of the Missouri River is poorly known. It is the most frequently encountered toad in eastern Montana. The geographic and habitat relationships with other toads in Montana are not well known. Any located should be well documented with a description written at the time indicating how this species was differentiated from other toads present in Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4. 10 o (/) c o CO > 0) CO O U 00 m CO a> c Q S o> O) ^— o _i o o b m (0 G) D ■o c h> 0) o o •o 4^ o o U3 0) o o 0) o 0) o u 0) en CD E 1 o> 3 00 in 0) m O) t m en O) o ^ J «- »- D. ► <3^ 2 i Great Plains Toad {Bufo cogtiatus) Description: Adults have dry skin with small warts. The coloration is dominated by a number of large, dark, somewhat symmetrical spots surrounded by light edges on the back. The dorsal background color is gray, light brown or olive green. The Great Plains Toad has converging V-shaped cranial crests between the eyes and post-orbital crests connecting to them at a right angle behind the eyes; the post-orbital crests typically touch the parotoid glands. The pupils are horizontal. The adult has two black tubercles on the hind feet and a body length of 2-3.5". Eggs and Tadpoles. Similar to the Woodhouse's Toad. Similar species: Other Montana toads lack the somewhat symmetrical spotted pattern on the back. NOTE: It is very difficult to distinguish among the four Montana toad species in recently transformed toadlets. Habitat and Habits: Adults may favor higher elevation grasslands than Woodhouse's Toad which favors floodplains (Bragg 1940, Timkin and Dunlap 1965, Black 1970). They have also been found in agricultural areas, open Ponderosa pine forests and savannahs in southeastern Montana (Black 1970). They are most active on nights following heavy rains (Hammerson 1982a). They normally breed in temporary ponds resulting from heavy rains or irrigation runoff or reservoirs with much fluctuation (Bragg 1940, Hammerson 1982a). In Montana breeding apparently occurs from May to July (Black 1970). Females lay strings of eggs which hatch after 2-3 days (Hammerson 1982a). Young typically metamorphose after about 1.5 months, though this has been reported to occur in as few as 1 7 days (Hahn 1968, Hammerson 1982a). They spend much of the year underground and emerge in response to warm rains. Adults were encountered on the Miles City District, BLM in 1998 between 29 April - 25 June, tadpoles were noted at two sites (Garfield and Prairie counties), on 24 and 30 June. Surveying: Adults may be located by using their loud, identifying calls on warm (>60° F) nights following heavy rains (Hammerson 1982a). "Road hunting" on warm nights may also be effective. Eggs and tadpoles are seen in ponds during the day and can be sampled with a dipnet; however, identification of toad eggs and tadpoles is difficult or impossible in the field. Status: Occurs in localized areas in eastern Montana, with large gaps in its known range. Geographical and habitat relationships of the Great Plains Toad with other toads in Montana are not well known, nor are status and distribution clear This species was found on 6 surveys in 3 counties in 1998 (Table 1, Appendix 2). It should be watched for at low elevations in prairie or shrub-steppe habitat. Any located should be well-documented with a description written at the time indicating how this species was differentiated from other toads present in Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S3S4. 12 03 H- to O o ■:: c fn a> •t-j 00 c to to O) g CD > to b > -J CO 1 LO k. U u O) 0) CD •o to 0) CF^ O 0) to a. ^ (0 to ■o c k> 10 o o ■D ^rf o o (A 0) o (J 0) r>. a> o o O) o o> E , C3^ 3 CO to 0) m o> 1 CO C3i O) Q) Q. • ► <^ 9 O a. s. ■ 50 F (Hammerson 1982a). Tadpoles are seen in ponds during the day and can be sampled with a dipnet. Surveying is complicated by the long time periods which this species spends underground, especially during droughts. Status: The Plains Spadefoot was found at a single location in Custer County during our 1998 surveys (Appendix 2), and breeding was documented at 3 sites in 1995 in Carbon County (Appendix 3b). There were two additional reports from 1998 (in Treasure and Yellowstone counties). Despite few reports, spadefoots have been reported over the years from throughout the Miles City District, BLM. It is apparently locally common in eastern Montana (such as southern Carbon County), but there are large gaps in the known range. It should be watched for in prairie or shrub-steppe habitat, especially following late-spring and early- summer rains. Any located should be well-documented. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4? 16 o to c o V-' CD > 0} CO o CD c CD o (D CO CO Q O >. ■•-• ■4-J CD O u (D CO C O) in E 0» T 9 o> a» ^ t a> 3 o» e 00 m 0) '^ 3 m O) t CO o ■ en O) (U 3 Z *" ^~ C^ 2 ■ 5 c a • ► <] - ^ • li. o Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Description; The largest of North American frogs, adult Bullfrogs may reach 8 inches in body length. The skin is smooth. Adults are usually pale to dark green or brownish green with darker spots or blotches. There are a series of black bands across the legs. The underside is cream to yellowish with gray mottling. No dorso-lateral folds are present, however there is a prominent ridge running from the eye over the tympanum to the shoulder. Males have extensive yellow pigment on the underside, especially in the throat region, and swollen thumbs. The diameter of the tympanum is larger than the diameter of the eye in males but about the same size in females. Eggs and Tadpoles: Egg masses are a 1-2 egg thick film of thousands of eggs and may reach several feet across. Tadpoles may reach 4.5" in total length and are olive green with numerous black spots dorsally, the belly is white to creamy with varying amounts of dark mottling. Similar species: Other Montana Ranid frogs have dorso-lateral folds. Habitat and Habits: Bullfrogs are rarely seen far from the water's edge and are usually in the water. They are associated with larger bodies of quiet water such as ponds, lakes or backwaters of streams, usually with extensive emergent vegetation such as cattails or reeds. They emerge in the spring only after air and water temperatures have warmed considerably and insect populations are beginning to proliferate. Breeding takes place in June when males attract females to their territory by a series of very deep, loud "brr-umps." The large egg mass tends to float on the surface when first laid, but sink into the water prior to hatching (Hammerson 1982a, Nussbaum et al. 1983). Tadpoles over-winter in the Pacific Northwest, transforming during their second summer (Nussbaum et al. 1983, Leonard et al. 1993), The bullfrog is a voracious feeder, eating anything smaller than itself, including ducklings, fish, mice, frogs, and small turtles. Bullfrogs have been implicated in extirpations of native frogs and turtles, and declines in waterfowl production (Hammerson 1982b, Leonard et al. 1993, Kiesecker and Blaustein 1998). Surveying: Tadpoles and adults can easily be detected visually or sampled by using a dipnet; both may be found from spring through fall. Capture success of adults is enhanced by night sampling using a headlamp, as they are very wary and do not allow close approach during the day. Eggs are also easy to detect when laid in the early summer. Status: Bullfrogs are native to the eastern and central U.S. and have been introduced to the western states. There are at least three older records from the 1970's in the survey area (two in Carter County, one at Fort Peck), although none as yet known from lands in BLM stewardship. However, it is possible that several unauthorized releases have occurred on private lands, based on conversations with ranchers in the region. They were introduced into western Montana prior to the mid-1960's (Black and Bragg 1968), but the date when they were first brought to eastern Montana is unknown. Bullfrogs were not recorded on our surveys. They should be watched for in ponds, lakes, sloughs, or slow streams on the Miles City District, BLM, Any located should be well documented. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 SE4. 18 o o (0 c (0 c 0) ■•-> CO 00 "q. b >■ "^ O) CD o. —1 1 > (0 u CO 0) V) c CO to O) JD cc 0) '~ O '^ m en ■o c k. n o o T3 o k. o u> 0) k. O o 0) r>. 0) o o O) u IS O) CD E 1 O) D 00 in 0) m O) 1 0) at O) a> Q. • ► <]^ 01 o 09 'C 0> — OB E ° I Northern Leopard Frog {Rana pipiens) Description: Adults are brown or green with large, dark spots surrounded by light-colored halos on the sides and back. The dorso-lateral folds (ridges along the sides of the back) are usually lighter in color that the surrounding background. The under-side is typically white, but may be cream-colored or yellowish. The aduh has a body length of 2-5". Newly transformed froglets may lack spots and are about 1" in length (Leonard et al. 1993). Eggs and Tadpoles: Eggs are laid in 2-5" globular masses composed of hundreds to thousands of eggs (Hammerson 1982a, Nussbaum et al. 1983). The tadpoles are brown to dark brown on top with some metallic flecking, whereas the underside is often nearly transparent (Nussbaum et al. 1983). Total length of tadpoles may reach more than 3"; the eyes are located on top of the head. Similar species: None, ahhough some newly-transformed froglets may lack spots, which makes them extremely difficult to distinguish fi-om Spotted and Wood Frogs. Habitat and Habits: Northern Leopard Frogs are found in or near water in non-forested habitats. Vegetation is typically dense, as in a cattail marsh or dense sedge-meadow, although there is evidence that very dense vegetation may exclude frogs (Miller 1978). Breeding takes place in lakes, ponds (temporary and permanent), springs, and occasionally backwaters or beaver ponds in streams. Adults were noted from 8 April to 24 July during 1998, eggs or tadpoles were found from 1 April to 22 July. At survey sites where Northern Leopard Frogs were present in 1998 (n = 58), eggs or tadpoles were detected on 1 of 15 April surveys, 7 of 17 May surveys, 9 of 13 June surveys, and 1 of 13 July surveys (G = 18.366, df = 3, P < 0.001), indicating a peak in breeding during May and June. In Colorado, eggs hatch in 4-15 days and tadpoles take 8- 1 5 weeks to metamorphose, depending on water temperature (Hammerson 1982a). Surveying: Adults, tadpoles, and eggs are easily seen in and along the water during the day, and can be sampled with a dipnet. Adults may also be captured by hand. At very low densities adults may be difficuh to find and may be detected using a call recorder. Tadpoles are difficult to tell from those of the Spotted Frog in areas where the two species overlap, but this is not likely to occur on BLM lands in eastern Montana. Status: Historically, the Northern Leopard Frog was widespread in Montana but it now appears to be extinct throughout much of the western part of the state (Werner and Reichel 1994, Werner et al. 1998). Its status is not clear in central Montana, and it appears that only localized populations are present on the western edge of the plains (Reichel 1995a). It is still relatively abundant and widespread across much of eastern Montana. Northern Leopard Frogs were found at 5 of 6 historical sites surveyed within the Miles City District, BLM in 1998 (1 in Custer County, 2 in Roosevelt County, 3 in Rosebud County). In 1998, leopard frogs were found on 58 surveys in 13 counties (Appendix 2) and during opportunistic encounters in 4 additional counties (Appendix 4). Breeding was documented at 15 sites. It is fairly common in southeastern Montana and northwestern South Dakota on the Ashland and Sioux districts, Custer National Forest (Reichel 1995b, Hendricks and Reichel 1996, pers. obs). Visher (1914) called it abundant in adjacent Harding County, South Dakota. Given its dramatic declines in western Montana and other states and provinces, however, breeding sites should be documented and a long-term monitoring program begun. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G4 S3S4. Species of Special Concern. 20 CD o c g > w O c ^ •«-> (U CO Q. Q 0) rn >- ♦"I CO i— U T3 rn >- p^ 0) o € n O) o • o> E 3 I E 03 in 0) 3 m O) 1 m o ■ CT) CT> 0) o S ^ Z Q. b « ■ ■ V J-^ S r • ► <^ - ^ ^ i o S Common Snapping Turtle {Chelydra serpentina) Description: The Common Snapping Turtle appears too large for its shell. The upper shell is olive-gray, or brown to black with the posterior edge very serrated; it has three low keels with protrusions positioned on each scute (a scale-like plate on the shell). The much-reduced lower shell is cream-colored. A long, keeled tail and warty tubercles on the head and neck are distinguishing characteristics. Males average about 10-20% larger than females, and have the anal opening posterior to the rim of the upper shell (Ernst el al. 1994). Most aduhs range from 13-30 pounds in Montana, the largest known Montana specimen was a 47-pound male (Reichel and Flath 1995). Eggs and Young. The spherical, white, tough-shelled eggs are about 23-33 mm in diameter (Ernst et al. 1994). They typically number 20-40 per clutch (Ernst et al. 1994). Coloration of young turtles is similar to adults and the upper shell is 24-3 1 mm long. Similar Species: None. Habits and Habitat; Snapping turtles occur in stock ponds, reservoirs, sloughs and backwaters, rivers, irrigation ditches, and slower-moving streams, such as Otter Creek in Powder River County (Hendricks and Reichel 1996). They prefer waters with a soft mud or sand bottom, and much aquatic vegetation or debris (Ernst et al. 1994). They do occasionally move overland, but are found doing so less frequently then Painted Turtles. Food is mostly animal matter. In the north it is most active in the morning and evening (Ernst et al. 1994). Adult females first breed at 12-19 years of age in Michigan and Ontario (Ernst et al. 1994). Eggs are laid in nests excavated in sandy or gravelly areas or muskrat houses in late spring or early summer. Sex is determined by the temperature of incubation (Ernst et al. 1994). Hibernation is in soft bottoms, under cut-banks, or among submerged roots. Snapping Turtles have a reputation for an evil temper, and are quick to bite. They can be handled safely if carried by the tail with the upper shell a\i'ay from the captor. Surveying: Although various turtle traps can be used for surveys, visual identification is suitable for presence/absence studies since the three turtle species in Montana are easily distinguished. Surveys should be done on sunny days with a pair of binoculars. During cold or cloudy weather, turtles tend to remain underwater for long periods and can be missed on a walk- through survey. Status and Distribution: Common Snapping Turtles occur in the Yellowstone River downstream from Billings, the Missouri River downstream from Ft. Benton, and probably all tributaries (such as the Tongue River) with suitable water. There are no records downstream from Ft. Peck Dam. They also occur in water bodies that can be reached by a short trek across land. Eastern Montana records are few, widely scattered, but mostly concentrated in the coal country of Rosebud and Powder River counties. Some snapping turtles are caught with fishing tackle. Concentrated unregulated harvest could be detrimental to local populations. Although not encountered in 1998, it is probably more abundant and widespread in eastern Montana than records indicate. For example, there are no records in the MTNHP database for Wibaux County, but a local farmer said they are resident in Beaver Creek south of Wibaux (pers. comm. 1998). It should be watched for particularly in ponds, streams, and rivers; any animals located on BLM lands should be documented. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S3. Species of Special Concern, BLM Special Status Species. 22 (/> ■t-' H- 3 o o k_ k- en (U •*-J 00 r ^ CO CT> o c h (y> ♦^ Q. >• ^ ^— CD CO _I ' > X CJ CO ID • c to O n o (1) ■"^ O 1 '^ er> m ■o c ^ n n o T3 ^rf U) O u o a> h. 0) o o O) o en E 1 en D 00 m 0) (T> Ol 1 <0 C3^ O) 0) -J »- »- Q. • ► <* at a E 2 S Spiny Softshell (Trionyx spiniferus) {=Apalone spinifera) Description: Spiny Softshells have flexible, leathery shells. The carapace is olive-gray, marked with dark spots. The plastron is white or light cream-colored. Female carapace length is up to 18 inches or more, whereas males are typically 6-8 inches. The nostrils are terminal, allowing this turtle to remain entirely beneath the surface and take air through its "snorkel." Eggs and Young. The nest is a flask-shaped excavation containing 4-39 (typically 12-18) hard- shelled, spherical, white eggs. The individual eggs range in size from 24-32 mm in diameter and average about 28 mm. Hatchlings resemble adults and are 30-40 mm in shell length (Ernsts/ a/. 1994). Similar Species: None. Habits and Habitat: Spiny Softshells are active during the day. This highly aquatic turtle is found in rivers or their connecting backwaters with muddy or sandy bottoms. Unlike other Montana turtles, they do not move overland from one water body to another. Mud and sand banks and bars are used for both basking and nesting. Hibernation takes place beneath the water, usually beneath 5-10 cm of bottom substrate (Ernst et al. 1994). The retracted head and neck combines with the profile of the shell to produce a wedge shape, which allows this turtle to escape by literally diving into the bottom mud. If necessar\', additional strokes of the legs will completely bury it in the substrate, hidden from view. Food items include fish, crayfish, frogs, toads, aquatic insects, and carrion. Spiny Soft-shells have a surprisingly long, agile neck and can inflict a painfiil bite. They can be safely handled by grasping the shell on each side between the front and rear legs with the head pointing cmay from the captor. Surveying: various turtle traps can be used for surveys, although visual identification is suitable since the three turtle species in Montana are easily distinguished. A pair of binoculars is helpfiil and surveys should be done on warm sunny days; basking seldom takes place before 10:00 a.m. (Ernst et al. 1994). During cold or cloudy weather, turtles tend to remain underwater for long periods and can be missed on a walk-through survey. Care should be taken to watch for the snorkel-like nostrils projecting just above the surface of the water. Status and Distribution: Status of this species in eastern Montana is uncertain, as it is reported infrequently. It was not encountered during the 1998 surveys. It may be more common and widespread than current records indicate. For example, this species has been seen 3 consecutive years (1995-1997) on the Tongue River in Rosebud and Custer counties near Brandenburg. It is found mainly in the Yellowstone and Missouri Rivers and their major tributaries (such as the Tongue and Musselshell rivers). The Yellowstone and Missouri rivers populations may be separated from each other, and are believed to be disjunct from the population in South Dakota (Ernst et al. 1994); they have not been reported from North Dakota (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966). The Missouri River population is known from the tail of Fort Peck Reservoir upstream to the first dam, and from most of the Musselshell River. They have not been reported from Fort Peck Reservoir or in the Missouri River downstream from Fort Peck Dam. Any located on BLM lands should be documented and reported. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S3. Species of Special Concern, BLM Special Status Species. 24 o CO c .9 ■♦-' > 0) CO o CO o ■•-' .— o »- Q. CO E CO Q 0) (J CO "^ >• CO ^ :^ -T CD 00 (J) I m n "O c w to o O T3 *rf o i- o u> 0) O o 0) r^ a> o o O) o CD in en E ^ 1 o> 3 00 in 0) CJl CJ> en CO 3 1- »- Q. ► E b CO 0) u to to o^ ^ o (1) '" O c > SI 2 0) 0) ■D c CO o O ■D 4^ O k. o Cfl O u 0) r>. 0> o o O) o o e 05 E 1 cn 3 00 tn 0) CD O) 1 en Oi O) 0) J »- »- Q. • ► <]i;^ 8 a. o> — OB g r- Z if S Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma hernandezi [= doiiglasi]) Description: The Short-homed lizard has a broad, somewhat flattened body and relatively short limbs and tail. It is generally tan to gray with dark and light spots and blotches; the belly is white. There is a distinctive line of pointed scales along each side, and the head has short, blunt "horns" pointing backward. Adult lizards range from 1.7 - 5.5" in length. Young. Young are live-bom and resemble small adults. Similar species: None. Only one other lizard species in the region. Habitat and Habits: Short-homed lizards are found in a variety of habitats, including dry open forests, grasslands, and sagebmsh; the soil is usually loose or sandy. In firmer soil situations, it may use the burrows of other animals. It is active during the day, typically with the peak of activity in mid-late morning. A Short-homed Lizard may squirt blood from its eyes when disturbed. Little is known about reproduction in this part of the range; young are born live in late summer (Baxter and Stone 1985). A small juvenile was encountered on 1 1 September 1995 in Carbon County (Appendix 4). Ants are the primary food of the species. Surveying: They may be surveyed by slowly walking through appropriate habitat and watching carefully for them, looking especially near ant mounds. This technique has low success with Short-homed Lizards however. As with many lizards and snakes, they are easily missed. Carefully documented incidental observations may provide the best clues to their distribution. They may be also taken in pitfall or funnel traps in combination with drift fences. A juvenile was captured inadvertently in 1995 in a pitfall trap set for shrews (pers. observ.). Status: The Short-homed Lizard was a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Category 2 Candidate species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). It is widely distributed, but apparently localized in eastem Montana. Although not encountered during the 1998 surveys, the species is fairly common on the south side of the Pryor Mountains in Carbon County, and there was one 1 998 record reported from that area. There are several other areas in southeastem Montana where records are clustered. Although there are no records for Montana counties bordering the Dakotas, there are several records from adjacent counties in North Dakota (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966), and it was reported as common in Harding County, South Dakota (Visher 1914), where it is still considered locally common (Stukel and Backland 1997). This species may be vulnerable to collecting for the pet trade and agricultural conversion of native habitats. It should be watched for in open pine, prairie, or shrub-steppe habitat with loose or sandy soils, all sightings should be documented. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4. 28 o to c q (0 > 0) CO n O (O to o 0) o o r> +j 00 CO to O) O) 2 <3> CO — i CO 1 L_ u O) o n CO o> o 0) '^ M m ■o c OT o O XJ ^ o ^ o M 0) o o 0) r«. 0) o o a> o 9 O) in E 1 CJ> 3 00 m 0) CJ) CT) 1 a> CO 5 r— »— D. • ► <^-^ OB O a. a> ■ S E ■s o Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus graciosus) Description: The Sagebrush Lizard is small (1.5 - 2.5" body length) and narrow-bodied. The color pattern in adults consists of alternating dark and light stripes running down the back. The colors are typically brown, gray, and cream. Males have mottled blue throat patches and bright blue belly patches, while females are white or yellow below (Censky 1986). The body and tail scales appear somewhat spiny. Eggs and young: There are 2-7 tough, white leathery eggs in a clutch, averaging about 7.5 X 12 mm (Nussbaum el al. 1983). Body length of hatchlings is about 25 mm, and coloration is similar to adults. Similar species; None in the Miles City District, BLM region. The Short-homed Lizard has a wide body. Habitat and Habits: Sagebrush Lizards are found primarily in sagebrush areas, but also occur in open forests and brush lands; they are found in both areas of fine soils and rocky outcrops (Hammerson 1982a, Baxter and Stone 1985, Nussbaum etal. 1983). In the Yellowstone area, they are found near thermal features (Mueller 1969). They are active during the day, with peaks of activity around 10 a.m. and 4:30-5:30 p.m. (Hammerson 1982a). Females lay eggs in loose or sandy soil in early summer; the young hatch in late summer. Small juveniles were captured in Carbon County on 25 September 1995 (Appendix 4). They feed primarily on insects and other arthropods. Surveying: They may be surveyed for by slowly walking through appropriate habitat on warm, sunny days and carefully watching for them; this technique is very eflFective for the Sagebrush Lizard. However, as with many lizards and snakes, they may easily be missed if conditions are not correct. Careftilly documented incidental observations provide excellent clues to their distribution. They may be captured with a pole and noose or may be also taken in funnel traps with drift fences. Adults and juveniles have been captured inadvertently in pitfall can traps set for shrews (pers. observ). Mark-recapture methods offer the best opportunity for determining population status. Status: The Sagebrush Lizard was a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Category 2 Candidate species (USFWS 1994). It is apparently locally common in southern Montana, from Yellowstone Park eastward to at least Chalk Butte in Carter County. The species was common in Carbon County on the south side of the Pryor Mountains in 1995 (Appendix 4). This species was not encounter during the 1 998 surveys, but there was one 1 998 record from Dawson County near Glendive. They are known from the western border of South Dakota south of Harding County (C. R. Peterson pers. comm., Stukel and Backlund 1997), and two disjunct populations are known from the western edge of North Dakota (Censky 1986). This species should be watched for, and any animals located should be documented. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4. 30 CO H— CD o o C "l_ tf) (U CO 00 c > cn q CD > to Q. Q >• 2 —I CQ k. O U CD <0 V) o CO O) n r jQ) ■«" O o o 2 m CO ■o c hm (0 o o ■o o o (A £ o o 0) u r^ 0) o o en e} en en E 1 en 3 00 m 0) (7> en 1 CO en en a> -1 »— T— Q. ► <^^ a o &. • OB a S E CD C 11 Smooth Green Snake {Liochlorophis [=Opheodrys\ venialis) Description: Smooth Green Snakes are small (about 16-20 inches total length) and slender. Dorsal color is uniform grass green, the belly is white. Scales on the dorsum are smooth, each nostril is centered in a single scale, and the anal scale is divided. Similar species: The Racer can be green on the dorsum, but not as bright green as the Smooth Green Snake. Racers in the size range of this species display a juvenile pattern of dark patches that is similar to adult Gopher Snakes and not at all bright green. The nostril contained within a single scale distinguishes this species from all other Montana snakes. Habitat and Habits: Smooth Green Snakes are usually associated with dense herbaceous cover in riparian sites, either in woodlands or more open county, but they occasionally wander into drier habitats adjacent to riparian areas (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966, Hammerson 1982a). When inactive or denning, they often occur under stones and boards, underground, or in rotting logs. Terrestrial insects and spiders are the primary foods, but it sometimes feeds on aquatic invertebrates. Lays clutches of 4-8 eggs rather than giving live birth. Eggs may hatch in August (Baxter and Stone 1985), but nothing is known of reproduction in Montana. A juvenile (24 cm total length) was found on 7 July 1998, but may not have been a young-of- the-year. Surveying: Walk-through surveys, especially through riparian habitats on relatively warm days, are probably among the best methods for detecting this species. Turning over boards, logs and rocks might reveal inactive individuals (Baxter and Stone 1985). Funnel traps used in conjunction with drift fences may be useftil, but most sightings are likely to be opportunistic. Status: The Smooth Green Snake is reported infrequently in Montana, perhaps because it is easily overiooked. This species occurs regulariy at Medicine Lake National Wildlife Reftige in Sheridan County (see Black and Bragg 1 968), although there were no confirmed records (photographs or specimens) for Montana prior to 1998. Two specimens collected in Sheridan County (Appendix 4) on 7 July and 28 August represent the first verified records for the state. Currently, this species is reported from Sheridan and Roosevelt counties, but it is likely that additional field work will reveal its presence in adjacent Daniels County, and perhaps on the south side of the Missouri River in Richland and McCone counties (Hart et al. 1998). Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S2S3. Species of Special Concern. 32 ^ Q> O o 'c 00 c 0) CO O) o CO b 2 C7> •^^ o b T— CD > CO —1 0) CO Q. o 3 CO CD Oi O ■^ ■=: m m C T3 c a w (0 o t' o T5 a. O o 0) ■5 • a o O) • CD en in (7) E 0» I k. 1 O) 3 o» K 00 CD 0) 3 ■ ay CJ) 0) 3 JS ex. ^ ^J-^ 2 m c • c • ► c o u b 2 CO (D CO (U ^ (0 G) JQ D 0) ■•" o o U i m en TO c to n o T3 o k- u M 0) O o 0) r** a o o O) u o >^- :3 () o o 'k_ U) w (0 c (0 o c Q ■♦-' r > (0 > o ■4-" T3 () 0) U CO i- (rt n Q) 0) O Qi ^ CO 00 I m en TJ c w « O o T3 o ^ (J U) 0) O o 0) r^ 0) o o o> u o o O) E 1 o> 3 00 in 0) CD »- 1- Q. ► +^ QQ LO k_ 0) U (D (0 Q. to a> n U 1— OJ •^ O Q. E CO ^ w m "D c ^ CO o o ■D o o U) £ O o 0) u h^ 0) o o m u o O) in E 1 05 3 oo in T— 0) (Tl O) CO O) O) J t- 1- Q. • ► <3^ s at ■c « Oi — o ■ ^ z ■s I Milk Snake {Lampropeltis triangidum) Description: The Milk Snake is a slender and medium-sized snake (to 42 inches in length or more), with smooth scales. It has a jighly recognizable series of red to orange saddles or rings that are bordered by black bands and separated by white or yellow bands. Width of dark and light bands can vary markedly. The subspecies in Montana (Z.. t. gentilis) tends to be paler, with orange bands replacing red, and a light belly with few or no black spots. Similar species: None in Montana. Habitat and Habits: Little is known of Milk Snakes in Montana because only a few have been reported. In Wyoming and elsewhere they are usually found near cliffs, talus, outcrops, and rocky hillsides in forested and open country (Baxter and Stone 1985). They can be found in or under rotten logs. Milk Snakes are secretive and most active at night. They eat a variety of vertebrates, including other snakes, lizards, eggs, small mammals, and sometimes invertebrates such as earthworms and insects. Eggs are laid in mid-summer. Milk Snakes sometimes vibrate their tails when disturbed. Their name stems from an old tale alleging that these snakes milk cows. Surveying: Timed site surveys can be conducted around cliff bases and outcrops. Nocturnal surveys may be the most productive Most distribution information, however, will likely come from recording incidental sightings. More intensive research may be done using fijnnel traps in combination with drift fences. The most intensive research and survey projects may use mark-recapture or radio-telemetry techniques. Status: Milk Snakes are very rare and local in Montana. There is only one record since 1995 (Powder River County, near Ashland) from within the boundary of the Miles City District lands in the MTNHP database, although there are several older records from throughout the district area. The majority of records are clustered at only a few sites, such as near Bridger in Carbon County, and Billings in Yellowstone County. None were encountered during the 1998 inventory. The subspecies found in Montana is highly sought for the pet trade. All records of Milk Snakes should be frjlly documented. Of special interest would be documented denning sites. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S2. Species of Special Concern. 40 1= o o ■D ^, r (0 to 00 a> o co h o> ■*-> JZ 4«j ^ T— CD Q. _J 1 > O m U") k_ r U 0) F CO Oi J3 CD 0) ■*" O JZ «^ m m ■a c CO o o TJ «rf o L. o UJ a> o o 0) t^ 0) o o O) o O) E o> 3 CO in 0) (T> O) 1 to 05 O) 0) J T- OL • ► <^^ o CB 0» ■ o ■ II Plains Garter Snake {Thamnophis radix) Description: The Plains Garter Snake ranges from 16-42" in length and has a dorsal background color of olive, brown, or black. It has a prominent orange or yellow dorsal stripe and a greenish-yellow stripe on each side located on the 3rd and 4th scale rows above the belly scales. It typically has black vertical bars on the upper lips. Young. Young are live-bom and resemble adults. Similar species: The other garter snakes found in Montana have the lateral yellow lines on the 2nd and 3rd scale rows above the belly scales. Habitat and Habits: Plains Garter Snakes are found in prairie habitats but are most common around wetland areas, where they feed around permanent and semi-permanent water bodies. In 1998, as many as 22 individuals, both adults (80-85 cm total length) and juveniles (30-40 cm total length) were seen along 400 m of shoreline at a single site (Blackfoot Reservoir, Carter County); most were sunning in or near shallow water around the reservoir with little emergent vegetation present. Fish, frogs, toads, mice and invertebrates are the most common food items in the diet of the Plains Garter Snake (Hammerson 1982a, Baxter and Stone 1985). Typical of most garter snakes, they emit a noxious secretion when handled and can be aggressive when disturbed. The Plains Garter Snake is a live-bearer, giving birth to 9-21 young during mid- to late-summer in Colorado (Hammerson 1982a). In 1998, this species was documented during surveys between 28 April and 24 July. Surveying: Timed sight surveys may be conducted around wetlands and riparian feeding areas or at denning areas where higher concentrations of garter snakes occur, clear mornings may be the best survey times. Much distribution information may come from recording incidental sightings. More intensive research may be done using funnel traps in combination with drift fences. More intensive research and survey projects may use mark-recapture or radiotelemetry techniques. Status: This species is found over much of eastern Montana, particulariy in the far eastern and north-central portions of the state. It is the most common garter snake in eastern Montana. Former status is unclear due to conflision in the identification of the 3 garter snakes that occur in the plains region. In 1998, this species was documented at 21 survey sites in 8 counties (Appendix 2). There were 7 additional encounters in 6 counties (2 counties not included in the survey records: Appendix 4). It should be watched for and any sightings should be documented with a description written at the time of observation, including how radix was distinguished from the other garter snakes. Of particular interest would be documentation of any denning sites located. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4. 42 o c o '■*-> CD > 0) CO n O en CO o O) c §■ CJ C to E ^ CO ;^ m 00 O) CD LO CD w n T3 c_ ^ (0 o O ■o o ^ o CO s o o 0) T3 r^ a> o O O) u en E ^ 1 O) 3 00 lO r- 0) 1 r— ^— a. ► ^^ 0) o § E » E J 2 U. 2 Western Terrestrial Garter Snake {Thamnophis elegans) Description: Adult Western Terrestrial (or Wandering) Garter Snakes are smaller in body size than the Common Garter Snake, their length varying from 18-43". Three yellow longitudinal stripes are present (one dorsal, two lateral), but the dorsal stripe is much narrower than that of the Common Garter Snake. A distinctive feature of the Western Terrestrial Garter Snake is a series of alternating black spots which run the length of the body between, and somewhat on, the yellow stripes. The background color between the stripes tends to be more gray compared to the dark brown found in the Common Garter Snake. The ventral surface has a series of dark black/brown blotches which may cover most of the surface. The dorsal scales are keeled, and there are normally 8 upper labial scales. Young: The coloration of young snakes is similar to that of the adults; young are live-bom. Similar species: See Common and Plains Garter Snakes. Habitat and Habits: The habitat and habits of the Western Terrestrial Garter Snake are similar to the Common Garter Snake (i.e., they are found in most habitats but are particularly common around wetlands). Females give birth to 4-19 young during the summer (Stebbins 1985). Records of adults from the Ashland area (Powder River County) were made between 28 June and 22 July at reservoirs or along streams (Hendricks and Reichel 1996). Surveying: Timed sight surveys may be conducted around wetlands and riparian feeding areas or at denning areas where higher concentrations of garter snakes occur, clear mornings are best for surveys. Much distributional information may come from recording incidental sightings. More intensive research may be done using funnel traps in combination with drift fences. More intensive research and survey projects may use mark-recapture or radiotelemetry techniques. Status: Western Terrestrial Garter Snakes are most common in the western half of Montana, and are much less abundant on the plains, especially in the eastern third of the state. There are no records from the northeastern quarter This species was not recorded during the 1998 surveys, but there were 1998 reports from Carbon and Yellowstone counties. There are only about 10 records since 1995 from within the boundaries of the former Miles City District. All records of garter snakes should be documented until the distribution of the three species is better understood; of particular interest would be documentation of denning sites. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S5. 44 (O o CD c to t?5 00 C7) o (0 b _l CD (0 > Q. O >• b CD C E (0 0) O) O (0 •^ m CO k ■o C 09 £: CO O o T3 a. o lU 1^ O u (1> "o S. eg F o O) o o o 1 E 0» Z e 00 C7) in CD 1 0) CO o 3 ■D C35 o> Q ■•-' CD > OT >- D ■»-> CO U Ol •♦-' en n (/) n t- (U O O ;^ > — ;-; m 00 I (0 m ft- ■o c a> ^ V) o i* o ■o a. (0 o V i- o o 0) o • a o O) o • o (S k- 1 CJ) E 3 <» OB T 00 C31 in 0) to O 3 a> CT) 3 ^ »- »- Q. '^ ■ (D « t ► XI C o 5 Western Rattlesnake {Crotalus viridis) Description: Rattlesnakes have a heat-sensing pit located between the nostril and the eye. The fangs are hollow and hinged, allowing them to be folded back against the roof of the mouth. The head is triangular in shape and blunt-nosed. There are several white lines which run along the side of the head. Adult Western Rattlesnakes a stout body with total length ranging from 15-60 inches. The dorsal background color varies from pale green to brown with a series of brown or black blotches edged with a dark and then light line extending the length of the body. The blotches often merge into rings on the tail. There are also blotches on the sides of the body. The ventral side is pale yellow to white and without blotches. The scales are keeled. The tail ends in a rattle which helps to warn potential predators of the snake's presence. The young have the same color pattern, but are brighter in color than aduhs. Similar species: No other snake in Montana has rattles, but see Racer, Gopher Snake and Western Hognose Snake which may have similar color patterns. Habitat and Habits: The Western Rattlesnake is an inhabitant of more open and arid country, but it is also found in Ponderosa pine stands or mixed-grass coniferous forests. It is more likely to be encountered on south-facing slopes and areas of rock outcrops. It is feared due to its poisonous bite and therefore often needlessly killed. Rattlesnakes may den in large numbers, moving up to 7 miles out from the dens during the summer (Peterson, pers. comm.); den sites are most common in south-facing talus slopes. In Wyoming, it is found at elevations of over 8500 feet (Baxter and Stone 1985). Rattlesnakes prey on a variety of animals including mice, ground squirrels, rabbits, amphibians, and other snakes. Females in Colorado give birth to 4- 21 live young during the summer (Hammerson 1982a). In 1998, this species was seen between 4 May and 22 July (Appendix 4). In 1995 in Carbon County, they were reported between 2 July (a juvenile, 39 cm total length) and 1 1 September. Most records from the Ashland and Sioux districts, Custer National Forest are from June and July (Reichel 1995, Hendricks and Reichel 1996), but one was reported on 27 September 1995. Surveying: Walk-through surveys on warm sunny days are probably among the best methods for determining presence/absence. This species is easiest to find near den sites in spring and fall. Funnel traps and night driving are both efi'ective techniques. Snakes are often encountered sunning on roads in the morning. Mark-recapture methods can be used to determine more precise numbers. Status: The Western Rattlesnake is more common in eastern Montana than MTNHP records indicate. Most encounters with this species do not get reported. In 1998, the species was recorded 4 times from 4 counties (Appendix 4), and 4 more times from Carbon County in 1995. Other 1998 reports are from Stillwater and Yellowstone counties. The species is widespread across the eastern part of the state. Nevertheless, there are no records whatsoever from the 3 northeastern counties north of the Missouri River, and no records from north of the river in adjacent North Dakota (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966) or Saskatchewan (Secoy and Vincent 1976). The habit of denning at traditional sites in large numbers makes rattlesnakes vulnerable to commercial collecting or simply killing by fearfiil people. Observations of Western Rattlesnakes should be reported to document the presence of this species elsewhere and to fill in distribution gaps, of particular interest would be documentation of any denning sites located. Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S4. 48 Species marginal, historical, or potentially present within the Miles City District, BLM This section lists 1) species whose affinities are generally restricted to montane habitats of the western third of the state, 2) species not documented in over 30 years from within the boundaries of the former Miles City District, and 3) species that might still be documented from within the boundaries of the former district. None of the species discussed in this section, except perhaps species from the first category, are very likely to be recorded from lands under BLM stewardship in the former Miles City District. Even the marginal species are unlikely to be recorded on the very small tracts that occur in the far southwestern counties (Stillwater, Sweet Grass, and Wheatland) without concentrated and repeated survey effort. 1) Marginal Species Western Toad (Bufu boreas). There are 3 records in the Miles City District, from Carbon County (West Fork Rock Creek in the Beartooth Mountains), Sweet Grass County (near Big Timber) and Wheatland County (near Hariowton). This species is a typical montane form found in intermontane valleys to treeline, and unlikely to be found very far from mountain habitats. Adults are distinguished from other Montana toads by lacking cranial crests Columbia Spotted Frog {Rana luteiveutris [=pretiosa]). There are 3 records from the Beartooth Mountains (East Rosebud Creek) and Crazy Mountains (Big Timber Creek) in the far western region of the Miles City District in Carbon and Sweet Grass counties. This species is found in western Montana in intermountain valleys to treeline, and is unlikely to be encountered far from mountains. An isolated population is reported from the Big Horn Mountains in Wyoming (Dunlap 1977), and may occur in the portions of this range that cross the border into Montana in Big Horn County. Columbia Spotted Frogs can be distiguished from Northern Leopard Frogs by noting a) spot pattern (smaller on spotted frogs with a light point in the middle of a dark spot, while leopard frog spots are larger, with a dark middle surrounded by a lighter halo), and b) ventral leg color (undersides of spotted frog legs are reddish-orange while those of leopard frogs are white to cream-colored). Rubber Boa {Charina bottae) There is only 1 record of this species in the Miles City District, from along the Boulder River in the Absaroka Mountains of Sweet Grass County. This is the only boa in Montana and cannot be confiised with any other native snake. The eyes and scales are very small, the tip of the tail is blunt and similar to the head-end. The back is uniform brown or dull green, and the belly cream to tan. 2) Historical Species Canadian Toad {Bufo hemiophrys) This species has been documented (confirmed) only once in the Miles City District and in Montana Two adults were collected at a pothole 1 mi W of Flaxville, Daniels County, on 30 July 1966 (Black and Bragg 1968) Because no additional records have been reported in > 30 years, the species is considered historical in Montana There have been few additional surveys in the far northeastern counties, so the species may yet reappear. The Flaxville site was visited in 1998 (Appendix 1), but only Northern Leopard Frogs were 49 detected during the survey (Appendix 2). This species is distinguished from other Montana toads by having parallel cranial crests fused into a lump between the eyes and lacking post-orbital extensions of the crests. Woodhouse's Toad lacks the lump between the eyes and has well- developed post-orbital crests; Great Plains Toad has converging cranial crests and well-developed post-orbital crests, but also has large white-bordered dark dorsal patches that the Canadian Toad lacks. 3) Potential Species Wood Frog {Rana sylvatica). This species is not yet known to occur in Montana, although there are a couple of non-breeding records from inappropriate habitat that are considered as introductions. The species might occur in eastern Montana in the Big Horn Mountains of Big Horn County. Wood Frogs have been documented from the Wyoming portion of the mountain range (Dunlap 1977). Wood Frogs are found near water in forested habitats, especially in small natural ponds and sometimes in backwaters and beaver ponds. It is unlikely to be documented on lands under BLM stewardship in eastern Montana. Aduhs have a prominent black facial mask extending from the snout to behind the external ear drum. There may be some spotting on the back, and the belly is white to cream-colored. 50 RECOMMENDATIONS Surveys and Research 1) Incidental sightings of amphibians and reptiles from the Miles City District should be recorded and forwarded to the Natural Heritage Program. Of particular interest are all observations and locations of breeding amphibians (tadpoles and/or eggs) and all reptiles. Use Reichel and Flath (1995) as an identification aid. Vouchers of amphibian tadpoles can be sent to the Natural Heritage program for identification. The Natural Heritage website has an online form for submitting amphibian and reptile observation data at http://nris.mt.gov/mtnhp/index.html . 2) Due to the time constraints and the large area covered in this survey, it should not be regarded as a definitive index of all the amphibians and reptiles or their presence on the surveyed area. The secretive habits of many amphibians and reptiles, and our lack of knowledge regarding their reproductive behavior make it difficult to assess their overall status. We recommend that additional surveys be conducted. 3) Long-term monitoring of typical marsh-pond habitats at several sites in the Miles City District should be established. Sites might include Ute Reservoir in Carter County, Beardsiey Reservoir in Custer County, Bailer Reservoir in Dawson County, Upper Labell Reservoir in Dawson County, the reservoir on the branch of Snap Creek in Garfield County, Split Reservoir in McCone County, Clark, Silvertip, and Homestead reservoirs in Prairie County, Missouri River oxbow pond in Richland County, and Armells Creek oxbow marsh and Sunday Butte reservoir in Rosebud County (see Appendix 1 and 2). These monitoring sites permit assessment of population trends and breeding success of the more common species: Tiger Salamander, Western Chorus Frog, Woodhouse's Toad, Northern Leopard Frog, and Plains Garter Snake. Particular attention needs to be given to any toad and Northern Leopard Frog breeding sites found. Life history and ecology of the amphibians in Montana is still poorly known for most species. Long-term monitoring will provide information on timing of breeding and habitat requirements needed for successful reproduction, as well as the kind of information needed for successflil management of local populations. Management 1 ) With an increasing number of amphibian species declining for a variety of reasons, it is reasonable to manage habitat to support them. While not all ways of preserving and protecting these species are currently known, several management actions could impact them negatively. Amphibians cannot survive without adequate breeding sites, and the type of water used is often species-specific. A) Stocking fish in ponds and reservoirs currently lacking fish, and in which amphibians breed, should be carefully evaluated. Fish introductions are thought to be a major factor negatively impacting amphibian populations in California (Hayes and Jennings 1986, Fellers and Drost 1993, Drost and Fellers 1996) and Oregon (Kiesecker and Blaustein 1998). It may even be desirable to remove introduced fish from some water bodies. B) When altering springs and seeps for livestock, protect a portion of the area that is suitable 51 for amphibian reproduction. This could include small fenced exclosures above water diversions to stock tanks, water from natural springs and seeps should not be divened immediately into stock tanks, as this could exclude amphibians from access to the water. At sites with significant overflow from wells and tanks, consider creating livestock exclosures along portions of the outflow. Consider fencing off sections of ponds and reservoirs that include shoreline emergent vegetation. This provides egg-laying sites and cover to immature amphibians, and also provides adults and immature stages with refugia from trampling by livestock Exclosures at ponds and smaller reser\oirs should be designed to account for water loss during evaporative drawdown, and encompass some water that wdll last at least to mid-August if possible. C) Create new ponds exclusively for amphibians to which livestock are excluded Creation of buffer zones (Semlitsch 1998) around these sites (and other sites as well) should also be considered, as the standing water in wetlands is used primarily for breeding and tadpole/larval development, not for much of adult activity by several species of semi- aquatic amphibians (such as Tiger Salamanders and the toads). Semi-aquatic species may disperse from large distances (> 2 km perhaps) to wetland sites to breed. .A.dult habitats also need to be considered in any active management program for amphibians. 2) A critical component of the life cycle in snakes is the wintering den. Many species hibernate in large aggregations at traditional den sites Often these hibemacula are used by more than one species (Koch and Peterson 1995), and mating often takes place at or near the den site. Snakes then move away from dens for as much as 6 miles in summer, returning in the fall to over-winter. These sites typically are situated where snakes can get well down into an area of fractured rock, often near cliffs or in talus slopes. While these sites are robust, they are vulnerable to disturbance, such as road building, or vandalism and over-collecting. Den sites should be documented and protected Fencing around dens might be suitable in some situations to exclude livestock. Sites should be monitored annually to determine use and relative abundance of species present. Den locations should be revealed only to responsible individuals. The Western Rattlesnake and Milk Snake are of special concern. Rattlesnakes are subjected to needless killing by the public at large, and susceptible to harvesting by unauthorized individuals selling venom and meat for commercial purposes. Local exnermination is a real possibility. Milk Snakes are highly valued by the pet trade, and over- harvest at dens is a real possibility Den site locations of this species should be shared only under special circumstances. 3) Traditional nesting sites of Common Snapping Turtles and Spiny Softshells. both BLM Special Status species, should be protected from disturbance of any kind, through use of livestock exclosures if necessary. Most nesting sites, however, will be near larger rivers and tributaries in sandy and sand-deposition sites, and subjected to flooding and shifts in channels. Protection of individual nests may include establishing predator exclosures around clutches. This would be necessary- only if it is e\ident that predators (skunks and raccoons in particular) are destroying an exceptional number of nests. Predation of turtle nests is often >50% in many areas, but '"normal" predation rates for Montana populations are not known. 52 BIBLIOGRAPHY Bj'^ter, G. T. and M. D. Stone. 1985 Amphibians and reptiles of Wyoming. Second edition. Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Cheyenne, Wyoming. 137 pp. Bergeron, D. No date. Terrestrial wildlife survey, Coal Creek Mine Area, Montana, 1977-1978. West Tech. & Eng., Inc., Helena Bernard, S. R. and K. F. Brown. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A. W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven Western States. Black, J. H. 1967. A blue leopard frog from Montana. Herpetologica 23 (4):314-315. Black, J. H 1969. The frog genus Rana in Montana. Northwest Sci. 43:191-195. Black, J. H. 1970. Amphibians of Montana. Mont. Fish «& Game Dept, Pub. No. 1 of Animals of Montana Series. Black, J. H. 1970. Some aspects of the distribution, natural history and zoogeography of the toad genus Bufo in Montana. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula. Black, J. H. 1970. Turtles of Montana. Montana Wildlife, Animals of Montana Series 2:26-32. Black, J. H. 1971. The toad genus Bufo in Montana. Northwest Sci. 45:156-162. Black, J. H. and A. M. Bragg. 1968. New additions to the herpetofauna of Montana. Herpetologica 24:247. Black, J. H. andR. B. Brunson. 1971. Breeding behavior of the boreal toad 5///o ior^a.y Af>/-t?af.v (Baird and Girard) in western Montana. Great Basin Nat. 31: 109-113. Black, J. H. and V. Craig (eds.). 1970. Amphibians of Montana. Montana Wildlife, Animals of Montana Series 1:1-32. Bragg, A. N. 1940. Observations on the ecology and natural history of Anura. I. Habits, habitat and breeding of i^M/o co^//a///.v Say. Amer. Nat. 74:322-438. Breckenridge, W. J. and J. R Tester. 1961. Growth, local movements, and hibernation of the Manitoba toad, Bufo hemiophrys. Ecology 42:637-646. Brunson, R. B. 1952. Recent collections of Bufo boreas boreas from western Montana. Proc. Montana Acad. Sci. 11:17-19. Brunson, R. B. 1955. Check list of the amphibians and reptiles of Montana. Proc. Mont. 53 Academy Sci. 15:27-29. Brunson, R. B, and H. A. Demaree, Jr. 1951. The herpetology of the Mission Mountains, Montana. Copeia 1951:306-308. Bureau of Land Management. 1982. Bloomfield - North Fork baseline inventories - wildlife. Miles City, MT. Burroughs, R. D. 1995. The natural history of the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing. 340 pp. Bury, R. B., P. S. Com, K. B. Aubry, F. F. Gilbert, and L. L. C. Jones. 1991. Aquatic amphibian communities in Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv., Pacific NW Res. Station Gen Tech. Rep. PNU'-GTR-285:353-362. Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc. 1981. Anaconda Stillwater project 12-month environmental baseline report. Tech. Rpt. for Anaconda Copper Co. Carey, C. 1993. Hypothesis concerning the causes of the disappearance of boreal toads from the mountains of Colorado. Conservation Biology 7(2):355-362. Censky, E. J. 1986. Sceloponis graciosus. Cat. Amer. Amphibians and Reptiles 386.1-4. Conant, R. 1975. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, xvii + 429 pp. Cope, E. D. 1879. A contribution to the zoology of Montana. American Naturalist 13:432-441. Com, J., and P. Hendricks. 1998. Lee Metcalf National Wildlife Reflige bullfrog and painted turtle investigations: 1997. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 20 pp. Com, P. S. No Date. Comment on the occurrence of Pseudacris clarki in Montana. Bull. Chi. Herp. Soc. 15(3):77-78. Com, P. S. and J. C. Fogelman. 1984. Extinction of montane populations of northem leopard ^rog{Rana pipiens) 'mCo\ox2i(\o. J. Herpetol. 18:147-152. Craig, V. No date. The Axolotl "Walking Fish." Montana Outdoors? 2 pp. Cutright, P. R. 1989. Lewis and Clark: pioneering naturalists. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 506 pp. Davis, C. V. and S. E. Weeks. 1963. Montana Snakes. Montana Dept. of Fish and Game, Helena, MT, pp. 1-10. 54 Diller, L. V., and R. L. Wallace. 1996. Comparative ecology of two snake species {Crotahis viridis and Pituophis melanoleucus) in southwestern Idaho Herpetologica 52:343-360. Dood, A. R. 1980. Terry Badlands nongame survey and inventory: final report Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks BLM Contract #YA-512-CT8-217. 70 pp. Drost, C. A., and G. M. Fellers. 1996. Collapse of a regional fi"og fauna in the Yosemite area of the California Sierra Nevada, USA. Conservation Biology 10:414-425. Dunlap, D. G. 1977. Wood and Western Spotted fi^ogs (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) in the Big Horn Mountains of Wyoming. Journal of Herpetology 11:85-87, Dunlap, D. G., and K. C. Kruse. 1976. Frogs of the Rana pipiem complex in the northern and central plains states. Southwestern Naturalist 20:559-571. Econ, Inc. 1974. Terrestrial wildlife inventory for the Lame Jones and Ismay coal lease tracts. Tech. Rpt. Ernst, C. H. 1971. Chrysemys picta. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 106.1-106.4. Ernst, C. H, J. E. Lovich, and R. W. Barbour. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 578 pp. Farmer, P. J. and K. Burgess. 1983. Jardine area baseline terrestrial wildlife study. May 15, 1 981 -May 15, 1982, for Homestake Mining Co. West. Tech. Eng., Helena. Farmer, P J. and K. Burgess. 1984. Jardine area baseline terrestrial wildlife study. West. Tech & Eng., Helena. Farmer, P. J. No date. Terrestrial wildlife survey. Pearl area, Montana, June, 1976 - June, 1977. Westech, Inc., Helena, MT. Farmer, P. J, S. B. Heath, D. J. Bergeron and K. L. Scow. 1985. Montana Tunnels project- baseline terrestrial wildlife study. Westech, Inc., Helena, MT. for Centennial Minerals, Inc. Feighley, H. P. 1997. Colonial nesting bird survey on the Bureau of Land Management Lewistown District: 1996. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 27 pp [herp locations in appendix] Fellers, G. M., and C. A. Drost. 1993. Disappearance of the Cascades Frog Rana cascadae at the southern end of its range, California, USA. Biological Conservation 65:177-181. Finch, D. M. 1992. Threatened, endangered, and vulnerable species of terrestrial vertebrates in the Rocky Mountain Region USFS General Technical Rep. RM-215. 38 pp. Fitch, H. S. 1980. Thamnophis sirkilis Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 270.1-270 4. 55 Western Chorus Frog {Pseudacris triseriata) Description: Adults are very small (0.75-1.5") and have tiny, almost unnoticeable toe pads. They have a dark line extending from the snout through the eye to the groin. Basic coloration is quite variable with the background color being green, brown, gray, or reddish. Typically 3-5 dark longitudinal stripes are present on the head and back which may be broken up into spots on some individuals. Eggs and Tadpoles: Eggs are laid in small clusters of 10-100, usually less than 1 " across and attached to submerged vegetation (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966, Baxter and Stone 1985). Individual eggs are about 1 mm in diameter. Tadpoles are brown/bronze and the eyes are located on the sides of the head. Similar species: Has tiny toe pads. Recently metamorphosed Ranid frogs could be confused with this species, but the coloration differs and the tiny toe pads are lacking. Eye position distinguishes the tadpoles. Habitat and Habits: Western Chorus Frogs are regularly found in the water only during the breeding period in spring. Their presence is obvious during this time due to their call, which is given frequently at night and sporadically throughout the day. Calls were frequently heard until late June. Eggs or tadpoles were found in ponds from 24 April to 22 July in 1998. However, the species was detected (tadpoles) on only 1 of 14 July site surveys. For standard site surveys (i.e., excluding nocturnal roadside call surveys) in 1998 where the species was present (n = 61), tadpoles were detected in 1 of 20 April surveys, 12 of 19 May surveys, and 17 of 22 June surveys (G = 28.016, df = 2, P < 0.001), indicating a peak of breeding in May and June. Following breeding, these frogs move into adjacent uplands and are rarely seen. In eastern Montana, they breed in temporary ponds and small lakes surrounded by prairie, in some locations in Montana they are also found in open forested habitats. Eggs hatch in about 2 weeks and tadpoles are about 2 months old at metamorphosis (Wheeler and Wheeler 1966, Nussbaum et al. 1983). Surveying: Adults are easy to survey, using their calls for identification during the breeding season in spring and early summer. During the breeding season, adults may also be seen in the water, but their small size and habit of freezing or diving when disturbed makes observation difficult, night surveys may be more productive. Egg masses are difficuh to find. Tadpoles may be seen in ponds during the day and can be sampled with a dipnet. Status: Common across the prairies of eastern Montana, including throughout the Miles City District, BLM, and the most frequently encountered amphibian in eastern Montana. This species was found on 69 surveys in 12 counties in 1998 (Appendix 2), and in Carbon County on 1 survey (and 5 opportunistic encounters) in 1995 (Appendix 3b and 4). Montana Natural Heritage Program rank: G5 S5. 14 o c o •♦-' > 0) C/3 n O eo c o .n E o CD CO a. — 00 W 0) TJ C- ^ to n O ■D o CJ U) 0) O o 0) u r»» 0) o o CT u O) in E 1 o> 3 IX) in di CD CJ) (L> Q. S • ► </a//5, in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History 13(5):289-308. Flath, D. L. 1981. Vertebrate species of special concern. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 74 pp. Flath, D. L. 1984. Vertebrate species of special interest or concern: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes. Wildlife Division, Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 76 pp. Gehlbach, F. R. 1967. Ambystoma tigrimtm . Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 52.1-52.4. Gibbons, J. W, S. S. Novak and C. H. Ernst. 1988. Chelydra serpentina. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 420.1-420.4. Halliday, T., and K. Adler. 1991. Encyclopedia of reptiles and amphibians. Facts on File, New York. 143 pp. Hammerson, G. A. 1982a. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, vii + 131 pp. Hammerson, G. A. 1982b. Bullfrog eliminating leopard frogs in Colorado? Herpetol. Rev. 13:115-116. Hart. M. M., W. A. Williams, P. C. Thornton, K. P. McLaughlin, C. M. Tobalske, B. A. Maxell, D. P. Hendricks, C. R. Peterson, and R. L. Redmond. 1998. Montana atlas of terrestrial vertebrates. Unpublished report. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, The University of Montana, Missoula, vii +1302 pp. Hendricks, P. 1996. Geographical distribution. Thamnophis elegans vagrans. Herpetological Review 27(2):89. Hendricks, P., and J. D. Reichel. 1996. Preliminary amphibian and reptile survey of the Ashland District, Custer National Forest: 1995. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 79 pp. Hendricks, P., and J. D. Reichel. 1998. Amphibian and reptile survey on Montana refuges: 1996. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 19 pp. Heyer, W. R., M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster (eds.). 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C. 364 pp. 56 Holroyd, G L , G Bums and H. C. Smith (eds). 1991. Proceedings of the second endangered species and prairie conservation workshop. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Nat. Hist. Occ. Pap 15. 284 pp. Jellison, W. L. and J. H. Black. 1970 Tularemia in Montana and turtles of Montana. Mt. Wildlife, Nov. 1970. Mont. Fish & Game Dept. Kerfoot, W. C. 1968 Geographic variability of the lizard, Sceloporns graciosus Baird and Girard, in the eastern part of its range. Copeia 1968:139-152. Kiesecker, J M., and A. R. Blaustein. 1998. Effects of introduced Bullfrogs and Smallmouth Bass on microhabitat use, growth, and survival of native Red-legged Frogs {Rana aurora). Conservation Biology \T.116-1Z1. Koch, E. D., and C. R. Peterson. 1995. Amphibians and reptiles of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. University of Utah Press. Salt Lake City, Utah. 188 pp. Koonz, W. H. 1993. Amphibians in Manitoba, pp. 273-275. IN: Holroyd, G. L, H. L. Dickson, M. Regnier and H. C. Smith (eds). Proceedings of the Third Prairie Conservation and Endangered Species Workshop. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Nat. Hist. Occ. Pap. 19. 384 PP- Leonard, W. P., H. A. Brown, L. L. C. Jones, K. R. McAlHster, and R M. Storm. 1993 Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society. Seattle, Washington. 168 pp. Mackie, R. J. and G. L. Dusek. 1993. A bibliography of Montana wildlife literature through 1992, DRAFT. Wildlife Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Project, Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 280 pp. Marnell, L F. 1997. Herpetofauna of Glacier National Park. Northwestern Naturalist 78:17-33. Martin, P R 1980. Terrestrial wildlife habitat inventory in southeastern Montana. MT Dept. of Fish, Wildlife and Parks and BLM. Manin, P R. 1980. Terrestrial wildlife inventory in selected coal areas of Montana. MT Dept. of Fish, Wildlife and Parks and BLM. Matthews, W. L. no date. Wibaux-Beach wildlife baseline study - nongame species. Unpublished report. BLM Miles City District, Miles City, MT. 93 pp. Matthews, W. L. 1980. Wibaux-Beach comparison study: Sidney, Glendive and Plevna study areas Unpublished report. BLM Miles City District, Miles City, MT. 50 pp. Matthews, W. C, 1981. Broadus-Pumpkin Creek baseline inventory - wildlife. Unpublished report BLM Miles City District, Miles City, MT. 57 McEneaney, T. and J Jensen. 1974. The reptiles and amphibians of the Charles M. Russell National WildUfe Refuge, 1974. Unpubl. mimeo. 3 pp. Micken, L. 1968. Some summer observations on the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigriniim, in Blue Lake, Madison County Montana. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci. 28:77-80. Micken, L. 1971 . Additional notes on neotenic Ambystoma tigrimim melatiostictum in Blue Lake, Madison County, Montana. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci. 31:62-64. Miller, J. D. 1978. OhstvJZXions on \.h.Q (^itioi Rana pretiosa, Raim pipiens, and Biifo boreas from western Montana. Northwest Science 52:243-249. Montana Department of State Lands and U. S. Office of Surface Mining. 1982. Final EIS, Western Energy Company's Rosebud Mine Area C, Block 1 . Montana Department of State Lands No date. Draft EIS, proposed plan of mining and reclamation, Zortman Mining Company and Landusk-y Mining Company, Phillips County, MT. Mosimann, J. E. and G. B. Rabb. 1952. The herpetology of Tiber Reservoir Area, Montana. Copeia 1952:23-27. Mueller, C. F. 1969. Temperature and energy characteristics of the sagebrush lizard (5cf/o/70/-//5 graciosus) in Yellowstone National Park. Copeia 1969: 153-160. Mueller, F. C. and R. E. Moore. 1969. Growth of the sagebrush lizard, 5c^/o/;on/5^ac/'o5z/5, in Yellowstone National Park . Herpetologica 2 5 : 3 5 -3 8 . Nelson, D. J. 1948. Lampropeltis triangulum gentilisinMontana. Herpetologica 4:170. Nelson, D. J. 1950. Lampropehis trianguhim gentilis'mMontana. Herpetologica 6:41. Nussbaum, R. A., E. D. Brodie, Jr. and R. M. Storm. 1983. Amphibians and reptiles of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. Press of Idaho. 332 pp. Olson, D. H., W. P. Leonard, and R. B. Bury (eds.). 1997. Sampling amphibians in lentic habitats. Northwest Fauna Number 4. 134 pp. Olson-Elliott and Associates. 1979. Environmental impact of the northern tier pipeline in Montana. Tech. Report prepared for Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. Olson-Elliott and Associates. 1980. Terrestrial wildlife inventory, Montco wildlife study area. Tech. Report for Montco, Billings, MT. 58 Ortenburger, A. 1. 1921. An eastern record and note on C/wr/z/a 6o//ae (Blainville). Copeia 100:84. Peterson, C. R., E. D. Koch and P. S Com. 1992. Monitoring amphibian populations in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. Unpubl. Report to Univ. Wyo. Natl Park Serv. Res. Center. 37 pp. Phillips, K. 1990. Where have all the frogs and toads gone'' BioScience 40:422-424. Piatt, D R 1969. Natural history of the Hognose Snakes Heterodon plaryrhinos and Heterodon nasicits. Univ. Kan. Publ., Mus. Nat. History 18(4):253-420. Powell, G. L., and A. P. Russell. 1998. The status of short-homed lizards, Phrynosoma douglasi and P. hernandezi, in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 1 12: 1-16. Powell, G. L., A. P. Russell, and P. J. Fargey. 1998. The distribution of the Short-homed Lizard Phrynosoma hernandezi in Saskatchewan, Canada. Northwestern Naturalist 79: 19-26. Redmond, R. L., M. M. Hart, J. C. Winne, W. A. Williams, P. C. Thornton, Z. Ma, C. M. Tobalske, M. M. Thornton, K. P. McLaughlin, T. P. Tady, F. B. Fisher, and S. W. Running. 1998 The Montana GAP Project: final report. Unpublished report. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, The University of Montana, Missoula, xiii + 136 pp. + appendices. Reel, S. 1989. Vest-pocket preserves. Montana Outdoors 20(2):27-29. Reel, S, L. A. Schassberger, and W. Ruediger. 1989. Caring for our natural communities: Region 1 - threatened, endangered and sensitive species program. USDA, USFS, Northern Region, Missoula, Montana. Reichel, J. D. 1995a. Preliminary amphibian and reptile survey of the Lewis and Clark National Forest: 1994. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 92 pp. Reichel, J. D. 1995b. Preliminary amphibian and reptile survey of the Sioux District of the Custer National Forest: 1994. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 75 pp. Reichel, J D. 1996. Preliminary Colonial Nesting Bird Survey of the Bureau of Land Management Lewistown District: 1995. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 97 PP Reichel, J D. and D. L. Flath. 1995. Identification guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Montana. Montana Outdoors 26(3): 1 5-34. Roedel, M. D , and P Hendricks 1998. Amphibian and reptile survey on the Bureau of Land Management Lewistown District: 1995-1998. Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT. 53 pp. 59 Rogers, T. L., and W. L. Jellison. 1942. A collection of amphibians and reptiles from western Montana. Copeia 1942:10-13. Scow, K. L. 1978. Terrestrial wildlife survey, Zortman and Landuslcy areas. Little Rocky Mountains, MT. Tech. Rpt. for Zortman and Landusky Mining Co., Inc., by Westech, Inc. Secoy, D. M., and T. K. Vincent. 1976. Distribution and population status of Saskatchewan's amphibians and reptiles. Final report. Saskatchewan Department of Environment. Regina, Saskatchewan. 42 pp. [unnumbered] Semlitsch, R. D. 1998. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 12:11 13-1119. Semlitsch, R. D., and J. R. Bodie. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12:1129-1133. Shaffer, H. B, R. N. Fisher, and C. Daividson. 1998. The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:27-30. Smith, H. M. 1978. A guide to field identification Amphibians of North America. Golden Press, New York. Smith, H. M. and E. D. Brodie, Jr. 1982. Reptiles of North America. Golden Press, NY. 240 PP- Stebbins, R. C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, xiv + 336 pp. Stewart, G. R. 1977. Chahnabottae. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep 205.1-205.2. Stuart, L C. 1930 An extension of the range of Co/MZjercows/r/c/or /worwoH (Baird and Girard). Copeia 1930:44. Stukel, E. D., and D. C. Backland. 1997. Animal species monitored by the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program. Prairie Naturalist 29: 179-213. Sweet, S. S. and W. S. Parker. 1990. Piiuophus melanolitcus. Cat. Am. Amph. Rept. 474.1-474.8. Thompson, L. S. 1982. Distribution of Montana amphibians, reptiles, and mammals. Montana Audubon Council. 24 pp. Timkin, R. L. and D. G. Dunlap. 1965. Ecological distribution of the two species of 5///o in southeastern South Dakota. Proc. S. D. Acad. Sci. 44:113-117. 60 Tinkle, D. W., A. E. Dunham, and J. D. Congdon 1993. Life history and demographic variation in the lizard Sceloporus graciosus: a long-term study Ecology 74 24 13-2429. U.S. Forest Service and Montana Department of State Lands. 1985. Jardine joint venture project. U.S. Forest Service and Montana Department of State Lands. 1986. Jardine joint venture project, final EIS. U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Department of State Lands. 1979. Draft, proposed mining and reclamation plan. Pearl Mine, Big Horn County, MT. U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Department of State Lands. No date. Draft environmental statement, proposed mining and reclamation plan. Spring Creek Mine, Big Horn County, MT. Visher, S. S. 1914. A preliminary report of the biology of Harding County northwestern South Dakota. South Dakota Geological Survey Bulletin 6: 1-126. VTN. No date. Second year's analysis of terrestrial wildlife on proposed mine access and railroad routes in southern Montana and northern Wyoming, March 1979 - February 1980. Tech. Rep. prepared by VTN Wyoming, Inc., for Shell Oil Co. Webb, R. G. 1962. North American soft-shelled turtles (Family Trionychidae). Univ. Kan. Publ., Mus. Nat. Hist. 13:429-611. Webb, R. G. 1973. Trionyx spmerfits. Cat. Amer. Amph. and Rept. 140.1-4. Werner, J. K. 1974. Phrynosoma douglassi brevirostre. Herp Review 5(1): 20. Werner, J K., T. Plummer, and J Weaselhead. 1998. Amphibians and reptiles of the Flathead Indian Reservation. Intermountain Journal of Science 4:33-49. Werner, K. and J. D. Reichel. 1994. Amphibian and reptile survey of the Kootenai National Forest: 1994. Montana Natural Heritage Program. 105 pp. Westech, Inc. [Western Technology and Engineering]. 1981. The eff"ects of the Tongue River Railroad on terrestrial wildlife. Technical Report for Tongue River Railroad Co. Westech, Inc. [Western Technology and Engineering]. 1982. Results of Phase one, step one, Little Rockies Project. Tech. Rpt. for Meridan Land and Mineral Co. Westech, Inc. [Western Technology and Engineering]. 1982. Wildlife reconnaissance. Cypress International Yellowstone Mine Prepared for Hydrometrics, Inc. 61 Westech, Inc. [Western Technology and Engineering] 1987 Valley View Hills: baseline easement report. The Nature Conservancy, Big Slcy Field Office, Helena, MT. 44 pp. plus appendices. Westech, Inc. [Western Technology and Engineering]. No date. Preliminary wildlife reconnaissance. Ruby and Little Ben mine arc x Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. Technical Report for Zortman and Landusky Mining Companies. Western Ecological Services Co. 1983. Wildlife inventory of the Knowlton known recoverable coal resource area, MT. Prep, for USDL BLM Com. No. VA-553-RFP2-1027. Western Ecological Services Co. 1983 Wildlife inventory of the Southwest Circle known recoverable coal resource area, MT. Prepared for US. Department of the Interior, BLM. Contract YA-553-RFP2-1027. Wheeler, G. C. and J. Wheeler. 1966. The amphibians and reptiles of North Dakota. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks 103 pp. Wilson, L. D. 1978. Coluber constrictor. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 218.1-218.4. 62 H < 1/-1 m >/-i i/^ O (N O O fp O o o o — tT ft OO'/^OOu^OOOiA O >/^ vA >/^ i/^ O "^ O (N -^ ir^ \0 rn r<-i O t^ O O — 00 -"^ 00 rr ro (S i/^CNr^CNOt^OI~~ r-r~^sOr^or^ — i/^oooor^oooo — — CNCNCNCNCNmCNCNCNCNCNCNCNr^CNCNCNCN U a c IE 00 ON ON 00 c 'C 3 T3 1/5 a. •a c5 c5 15 c 0/) >% > 3 c a. a. < Z o < o on c/: 00 oo — CN c/) oo C/D W W UJ 00 00 00 m iri u-^ ct: oi cci 0/: CO on CN CN CN H H H + CO 3 g c?5 + + Q 0) >:> o o OO E OO t/T -a o :0 — r/^ ^ 3 aa -^ + rj g o — C 0- ^ a. UJ o c Q. O OO CL c £ i: CN 4J . 00 c « • ^ OO + CN = ^'E o c '^ . o o ON o ' — -7 -^ OJ ^ 4> I- X TT O o >^ O UJ £ z 4> E tU OO tU O C~J — OO wo On On "^ ^ Z Z o o On On + ON r o + UJ _ o ■^ s £ ^ - O O « CO 9 o oi a: O) OJ 00 so C3 CO S = U, u, c c o O a. Qi < o a: o ^ ^ o t 1^ '^ SI -o *^ 1- p ca o ^ ^ 4> O) o W S S c o -J CQ 3 c« 00 c •c 3 "O "O V Ji Q. (U u> TD C a c jE o. s 3 ■♦-• c75 c o o c u a. Q. < H < (/3 H < Q > -J z o < u o . jS o :2 ^ UJ H 00 >, (U c/1 c tiiij ^ o Z ^^ ^ •«# ^ e a> o >> i/j c u- 3 C3 O X u c u o en 1/9 O 3 n U a. •a c c o >^ o o ^ CL CL. I >^ >, >% cQ CQ C^ s s s On OS On /-l ^3- ■* cC c£. ct z z z in r-- r- m ro m H h- H CO < ■■= c o 3 T3 O O 3 o c o o 3 O >,c2 <- -5? ^ — ^ 13 Oiriir)00000t--N0ir>00 m'^mmOmr^O — >/~iCNOr^ ro — r^mmTi-oor-ONONOOr<^ON -^ -^ <1 < = ^ ^ ^ Q. < ONONf^rnr'^ONmONrn'^'^'^OO CNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCN OOCNCNOOnOOOOOnOOOO On — — OiTi-^OOONON — — oor~- — (NCNrommrorom'^'^OON CNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCN — LU U on CN UJ Z Z z on UJ Z — r-i on on on in in Z Z on r^ — — c/5 on (/D LU UJ UJ m in m in m in Qi Qi Qi z z z r<^ r<^ m on UJ Z 00 On on on VO NO m m z z z on cyo -^ ON ON — on on on UJ UJ UJ NO nO NO in in m Di Cti Dd z z z r*^ r*^ r*^ z z z m -^ t^ HHHHt-HHE-HE-HHH + ■« UJ >-. in 3 o 00 re o U c o T3 E Q c o ■■E t t O •SI'S eft en , - a> (u .b Qi a: o I- 1- c _« _« + + + > > .b .b > h 5 o ^-v •- D ^ E oi '-'-■' 2 o o O 1.1. .'^ (U 4) u en en '5 O OJ 2 Cci tti Q. O en a. o o en (U o o en U U X> CO J u. o .b o t/5 ._ — '^ Q Q 00 00 D a: + en T3 c o X) O > > OJ u c c o o en en _o _o UJ UJ ^ o ir, z on > — 00 CN -J CQ + C/2 on on UJ UJ UJ NO m •^ in in m Qi ai ai ^ en c 5 3 en 00 _c 3 •o -o 3 ^3- >. >^ >, >^ ,^_ — „ — -"^(N oor-4 c c 3 3 CN CS en 5 > -J ON r- t^ O r4 H N C O + — ^ 2 u tn C 0) O a: + + '5 t en O O O Qi t 't t r^ oj a> (U c en en en c a> TO a: c»i Qi O :z ^ — > oo m m oo cyo UJ U CN CN z z m 00 + r- 00 X (41 u + 1 ■5 m t ^' (U e 3 (U >> en c + Di U CJ 3 I— 4> u- O ■5 W ■^ U t 3 "4; N TO lb c o U en I— in en I— ^^ "to en o ^J^ J^ 3 u. 0. «t C/5 < «i UJ J£ '- U c o CQ + 3 en 00 C •c 3 "O V en a> Vi c to o c en c75 (A 4> < H O O iri O O O — — <^ — ■^ (N -^ 00 vb OmOOOOi/~iOw^'/~i'/~>000000 O — rn O m m — — — O -^ r'l O fN ro — P r<-) Tj^ 6^ (N c^ r^ r-~ t~~ rn 6^ >0 rn rn t~-- O ■ — rn (N — OfSO — — — — — — — — ^- — — — QQ < c c c c c 3 3 3 3 3 . — — r^ m m (N CS (N CM - 2p ST Cd rv TO TO . -_ « 3 O < i < 2 C CO 3 "«^ O 'S- "^ -^ O^ O O^ m (N — -J (M m (N r~ (S o r- — (N o^ IT) r— 00 lAi I/-) r^ ro r^ ro ro ocMO~'0^fNir^'/^vovO'rroovo^>/~ir-4t~-o vOvO^ — O — — oo — ooooo^oomr-1 0'-n>/~i«^ooooor-~r-'^r-mr^r-r-v00 (N(N(N(N(N(Nri O vO S(N (N (N ^ > E Z -- UJ PJ — 00 Z Z (N m W z 1^ Z Z 00 r^ DO -^ — — -a •> ii -^ ^ r: ^ uj f;;: 00 00 OC vO i/^ sO E ^ c « (U 3 4^ e/i C 5 00 CO ^ ^ O ^1 lU o H oo + -jt: -T3 c JO c o T3 E CO w C o T3 T3 C CO CO 00 c o o o en tn (U U CJ o + E u. u- '- ii ii "^S a. a.(^ 0^ o ^ -^ -^ "S ivO 'co G + 4) e*. * O + w CO -7- < E 00 \o ■> .1= .i: |ii ^ c^ a: c _C0 E + iZ Hi + + o en en E E o o en u. Q. CO CO P 0- O en c o 03 + > 00 c 'C 3 "O ts -o CO a> so so o. (U en C 2 IS IS o. E CO o c en OO * O to Q O 00 00 _c 'C T3 n. T3 C c n3 Q. C CO <1> 3 t/) or) c o o '■o c d) Q. Q. < < C/3 Q > -J z o < o o o O o ir, O — o 0^ ON ^^ z z UJ W c/) vo o o r^ r^ c/: on W W C50 00 'T T Cci Qi Z z >ri m E- H w ^-^ z c E o o o >> *- Urn 3 o O O r f u (D aj t/l t/i 9i« 4J a> U a: Qi « c c u « w a. oa ca CO O w z on UJ ■o Z r-~ r-j t- O en t on iriOOOOmoo Nbt^NOfNiw-ivb-^CNi ^- ^" ^" I— Q. Q. Q. E < < < ^ c c c 3 3 3 r^NONOONONONOOOO — ^— — *-^ H E- E- H H H H H + c/1 w CO E On + CO o o a> ^ 3 !/) CO ■SI % S £= t« O L. V OS < oi < o t t/) 00 a; •^ S to o i_ o U. CQ CO E o 00 c o E ^ fN ^ 0- on CO O ON on U4 NO + IT} O^ >% i» Z f* . 1) (U y (yi a: e (U 3 r- ■^ O u-i 00 r'l (N ^— 00 O O^ CN I* > -J ^ uU LU + c« O a: 3 03 5 = I ° |o © on 1/-J Z Z (N 1 > 00 c 'C 3 •a •o u o (/I _o D. c CO CO O c on * 00 so Vi V O o. •a 2 #• u eO t J2 r« en ex) EO 2 II _] aa ♦ o > 3 'C ■•— » ly) <5' Q >> 3 c T3 yi II _U C 2 on , '""N > 1- c 'a 3 W5 en 00 j: o- ^ — ' C^ X ^" u 50 < D UJ •o CO T3 U O W "iJ -a t/) a. trt i> '■^ Cl aj u- T3 03 C w 15 IE a. 1— c < (N x; ^ c lU LU o. a. H < So 2 < - < ai <^ ai I < I X H ai H h- iri 1/-1 rr — S ^ E E 5! '^ ^ ^ *^ a. OS oi ai 2 ir. O O »/~i i/"! rr m -"a- (N <^) d o o o o o t X 3 O cn ^ o 3 O U U u o t o — ; 1- !r, ■5; 1- O t a: (U (U (/I (U D 02 o t c/l c o a. -a c CO u. t — ^ ^•^^^ *<*— ^ ^^^^ ^^ ^»«^ ^— ^ ^»-^ ^■*' a: ai Qi Qi o: C^ cC Qi aL OJ Cci P h- E- H H H h- H H H H h- 2 ^ cn (TD C/D en C/5 on on OD C/D on on ta^ Cu &. 0- 0- CL o. a. CU a. oa CL CQ CL < CQ OOmiriOOOmOiriOOOOO (Nr^ — mOiJ^ — O — OCNO — 00 do — — m odd m o O — — — O — (NOO O CO o a> CC O 0) CO Q. N - ^ ^ ■co c c Q- O O N o O 0) CO O O ■^ -^ LU 4> ^ u J= CO > E 4> u 3 CQ CO u. C U CO > — Oi u tn c c .■? ^ J — (N CO on ^ .t; tn ^ a> LU O t en aj a: 000 t t t a> a> aj c/) t/5 en a> w aj Oi Qi Qi O a: ^ CO Ul c o en LU O C a. o on a. .t; en M §. ii c aj LU c ■^ CO ■= aj (N aj C CO ^ :5 ^ a> CO I— CO c On aj O Q. c*_ O W o c ■? o — CO T3 CO O en 4> On -0-0 CO a^ r c o c UJ en C o > "^ aj i- o: < c u. _C0 "^ CO w a> ^ So a> ^ o oy LU Z .h ._ o E t r~- aj o od 1- >^ "~ aj T3 CO O a: ao CO c o — c o o LU aj aj aj en £ u t; CO aj CQ aj .E ' c o CO I a. < S 03 5 a. V. G g en DC Pi en i- a, :5 ^ S- I i O 2 OQ .ii -s: ^ |,^ :§ O op :-S H V5 c t/5 « o Q. TD 2 CO s s _2 J c/f DQ 30 SO a> o II "C M ♦ 5 > >^ _3 .ti u =5^ (yi -«— » _« 3 1 -o CO D II f ■«^ c C '•^-i^ IE en ■*-» UJ i u UJ CL ^ 00 3 CO 00 c a- £ o CO 00 3 X ■o u T3 Oi « < 0^ UJ C/2 U •T3 CO 32 '3 u o. CO Ji ■*-• O. v k> T3 c ca c CO 15 j: Q. E < /-«v •4-> c o o CM >< 'S c « LU Q. a. H < ^ + o ^^ ^■^^ ^ O ^^ m * D. u^ (/3 ^^ p Q. » < + a: O m ^— V '•^^^ * c^ + , — , H i/^ * a. a: Di H H ^-v on on + Cu cu o ,.— V T' ^-■ + ,*— N /^*S o ^-^ fN * * iTi O '•^-^ '"'^ a: H 00 2 H S H 00 03 o. < < a. iri IT) O O O •^ O m O — o o o — o to c z -o CO o '^ CO i| 3 ^ O U 44 Cj- O Z CO o CO CO (U O O < 00 IE C^ 11 o ai J2 o e J ■- ^ - ^ t «J U Uu =0 -g I , c o »: CO CO ^ « ai --* CO c o o o o o _ _ _ Cu C Q- I CO ' — ■ ♦ ^ "5 ^ Qi < C O >/^ i/^ O ni m — O O CO < 'P. CO c o o 3 O U 3 O U to e: CO Q tl 5 CO CO U 3 O c o o 3 o to 'ob CO < CQ a. < cd vO < — CL (N a. < to — Q. -— -= h- O ^ CL _ < - , X ^U o .^ . o o o m — O (N IT) — a. ^ < CL < * r- a: T- c^ - r o o ^ f- ^ ^ < 2 D D a: < CQ CQ 0000'/-iOOOOOOO 0— OOOCSO— O O t CO CO CD c 2 CO Q c o CO c (U o CO a: o. o Q 00 o — o t CO CO Ui O -J o o h c/^ c — o u s o u ^ C3 CO ■rr t- CO cci CO o 3 2 Qi CL O > to o > U to .b o 4J C£i CL D. to o o -J Q Q w 00 00 §; m m D o o > x> to a> a: o X5 > c o >- O i' CQ C a. t: S S" S 00 a. 5 3 K ^^ ^ CJ ^-^ O ^ <-> i; O 2 CQ .^ 3 "a o o '=) ^ I I -c X 5 U o □a 'C ii U "o a. -a eo so =0 > 3 C/3 UJ ^ Si >i UJ « a. ^ on 00 'p- o .E 00 c *c 3 •a •o aj a> ■a '5 D. C/5 Q. 2 "q. c o '■6 c a. < X u (ii < o LU m on — UJ on •a c o o. e X © o >> > o U C o e CO o V) « a» Q ;> iTi o •^ t S i o c/) 5 c^ o U 3^ O 1^1 u. 2: a. (N THRA( , THRA «• ^-—V y*"V '-v __ o — - — ' m ^ * O < lA R cci f^ E 51 Ohs: < ^-c G" cc * ^*v ^^^.^ "•"!-< ^ o * ^-^ ,_M ^**^ -'^N . ' * \_^ O^ (N SI * .— • '^"^ '•^-' RAPI STR( 1 SI < HPI( ), RAI STR( o o RAPI RAPI - ^:^ Q- ^— V H oi 0*^0- r- ^-- o o (N u -■^^ /^^ * — ^-; ^*^ ^^^ -—;'.-< + + — 1 _« 1 * ^^m^ ^^ m o — ^■"v O O ^^-^ l/^ -^-^ ^— r^ .— \,_.^ * 1/-1 in UCO STR( UCO H c/2 < 5! < O o API( STR( UCO t- on Qi Qi on on CQ a. CQ a. Qi Qi m Qi a, m a. a. D- — ^ IT) O O ir, o m — O O — — en c mooo>nmino O — en O (4-1 O E 00 3 <" ■O u. c > 2: = Qi O O ^ o t a: - t tn U. U 2 Z u m c W (U O H Qi J Su g o 3 - U t- c >. ■=' o U 03 u. ao o o t t en en , - en 9 cei UJ o en en OJ (U W oi o: a < a: >n t (N — on on a. o, o o c a: 5 ■- « o o w 04 U O O L. ._ s: a; o ■c I- O 5 CQ C a, t: en s; 2 -I ■S §■ *^ £: >1 s ■I en H £^ f- >- a. 5 ^ I 6(1 r« O ^-' i^ O x: o a 03 .y X i: I i §8 op -c IX 5 O 2 '5, 00 3 Q. a. c a c CO o o -a c Q. a. < "5 o. ■o CO CO oa 00 00 .4_J u o *C II « * Q > >! p -4-^ 5" w 1 ■ U 3 i « II ^ •»-* c c ■*— ^ 15 C/D UJ 1 u u &n u. 3 CO 00 c O O 'e < 00 00 < ^ * (N c/2 on 0. Q. -2 2 p. o o — cr, P ul — Qi aJ ai oi 5 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^ «5 < on on c/5 on < < Qi D_ 0- a. a. m o u~j ^ o — I/-) ir, O O O -^ O (N 00 00 O S c o w .:«: « o Z c o U = s ^ o N 4< VI O o < ^ < * O , V * ^^ * 00 — vy, "— Ov (N ^^ . CL -^ ^ — Qi , < < £• Q. ^ + + ^ ^ + O --< >/^ ^ * — ur, — » (N * M — ^ < 2 r in ^ — ' — a. "=- < r- on on a. a. , «- m ai Qi Qi a: ai H H H h- t- on on on on t/:i a. c- a. Q. c w o on ^ ^ on s a. CQ CO a. - - 5 c < 03 < on ai 0- a, < m iri o >/^ O O m — -^ O O O en ,:^ -a O 00 oc CO 1*- 03 o o re c o O c o 'e 00 u. c Z o j^s' UJ o 'e O • - >> ^ 'cz L- c C '5 > ^ "5 > .a <— u. _« L. 'u 2 D D CO T3 5 C/5 c o Q. u 2 P '^ u o H on ■T3 c re c o -o o o un CO ai ai T3 c 5 to C O -o •T3 C op IE E o H o UJ c o -o "^ E ■5 "5 § t/1 c/i >> 3 fi ij Q- a. (J ^ ^ ;;; 0) D 03 _> _> -o (^ cZ O as < "E 00 vO ■> .h .b |ii t« CA CO c ai a: c E CO O o o ai a: ^ ^ •n •n -a aj re re CO aj w S t _5 -J t/i CQ 00 ^ ao «-rf V o II *c vi * Q > >> _3 ■*— » CJ ^ « , . "3 u a. CO ^ ■ •^ ■f a. 9> o o ^^ (S x: c i> a. Q. < c75 D- < , ^ a: * ^ ^'■N r<-i ^**^ '■^*" * (N ir> * """^^ s^ ^■^-^ a: -> — Qi C/3 0- < a. on D. Di U a. O O i/~i o 1/1 O -^ (N o — ' o o 3 g § ^1 3 I- -^ O U .a Qi u C/1 (U ]C C/5 a. Cti Qi "« Q. T3 c C u CO OJ CO ca 0. O CG CQ o u o 00 03 c o 3 (J Cm o e cs •o c o Q. o = o o ^ ^? |g 5 2 o ^n d d 3 O U c 'S a, o o E to (U Op o W3 2 ♦ o: Qi a^ oL Qi h- i- h- H h- on C/^ on c/3 O) Cu 0. 0- Q- D- iriOOOOViOO 7". Ti 7" " "^ "^ ^ ""^ E on CO E o *- o c 3 ^ o o U £^ ■a O 3 « I £ O k. 0^ < On _ ^ O) CO c/) 00 cC - 8 o CO E o OO c c*- o ^ I i_ O u. ca 'r- CN ^ ,'- ' is "-^ "O i2 -^ S "OJ CO O i: 1- Q- on h- 3 CQ CO -o c 3 on a. < a: .5- O -= a. t: si c 9- 'C 2 -I 3 C ^1 (J --' a; "X. ^ H o a □a ii _ o o o QQ 3 C 5. 2.^ ; ,5. < 5. t/i (U o o. -o •2 (U 03 ^ t _rt -J c/f CQ 00 ao -t— ' u o II 'C crt * 5 > >> _n C ■^ CO ■*— » D 3 V— -a S « IE c/:) ■♦-- W i U m U 0- > CA u 3 CO 00 c ON 1 i/i 00 I T3 u -a oi B < 05 « -o CO (U 'o « Q. CO D ' 1"*. D. > ^ e Z 3 « o ^ U CO -J e > o ■^^ s es s Z o ^ U X 3 Co !5 - ^ 1 2 o Z o < o UJ c75 mOOOOOu-iiT) — rr o vo n- 00 cN r- c c c 3 3 3 — >-^— >33333 (NfNrofNfN — — — inOOOOTTOO ^vo— 'i/^r^'^^o — 00 — vOO — t~-r<^\0 z w z ^ uj" m o^ a m (N — on on c/3 P-1 u u r^i TT TT r-1 rj (N Di Di Cti on CO r4 r~- r-~ 00 h- h- h- > W UJ tU ^ > Z CO CO on on O^ m — r^ ^ — — r^ m !yi v:i u: u:: iy:i UJ w pu UJ w ■Jo * c o E Cl E * ^ Z 1 ^'E o -2 -^ O o "" 2 > c CO U w > CO O) CQ > c O *, CO c ^ ^ o U 2 d u. t« Qi iy5 ;? i^ to ^< o a.T3 CO r- E c c ^ §s c c g ■= a. Q. 2 S v5 O >% « 3 en ao c 3 T3 -o a> o CO a. c CO c CO o c CO C/D CO O Q. ■o 2 ii CO s _eO hJ ^ PQ CO CX) , r 00 o 3 ••~1 CJ CO =y » (1> c 3 on CO UJ >^ ^H 3 u UJ O 0. U on c o ^^ x> c b- CO E CO in u« C?N -C o ~ — ' X ao u c a: 3 < T3 UJ TD on U ■*-» O o. CO _o '^^ Q. a> k> "O § p; ctf ic 2 1 «*> X ■ »« "O e 1) UJ Q. a. H < on o CQ 0. on o CQ Q. on > o E ^ „, «« CO « (U CJ ^ i: to CO z i ^-; o > CO U CQ > o c CO CO r- E S cs en -o c o o. O u. o o CO > O. (/) „ W (U on Q Qi o U 2 -o 00 ^ a. '^ S c •= •- T3 O -C 9 h- c o. Q. C u. =« ^ CO S -^ ^ 2 ^ Qi 'on > on O .5 o CQ Oh CO ^^ I I s- on a. < u a o. V u g u r> H i- < Q t 3 !A 00 ON ON 1-^ bO c ■ ViN b 3 •o 2 Z J o 03 H -*— » < o u Urn o -J Q CO di -4-* c 2 a. k. -a "^ CO ON 1/3 '~ S 00 .5 c S 4> On ON ON ON On >/^ OO ^ oo >> On 9S 28 00 00 00 -^ <^ ^ ^ On >^ >> u. u- 00 ON 00 ON oo >^ON OO On 00 ON Cu c c c C ON CO , , CO CO p p « CO — C c on 3 "—1 3 3 3 ^—1 3 ON ^ Q-2 S < < "*^ — O (N tion wer ?3 tA ^.i t/5 \;^ X) CO o ^ O ^ c -^ § .S U -a r- ppen arboi < o c^ a. CO a. c 3 -o CO (30 .S a. on ex >. a <*- o a = C „ c 3 o CJ c o XI u. CO U s: s: s 3 UJ > 00 Z — NO OO or) CO oo ON 00 1^ Z c/^ oo oo CN rn rs| OO 00 oo r-- oo (N 00 (N NO o in o uj| 00 Z iri NO UJ OO > UJ oo oo oo oo 22 o o z z c/^ ^ , , , , 00 00 — — H -^ H H UJ UJ rf 00 ir^ iri oi a; z z -O NO C/5 UJ ^ Z oo Tf — m — I OO OO UJ UJ (N nO (N CN oo oo 3 -o CO en 3 ^ 3 CO ■S "^ 3 CO 00 en — tn - — ~ 3 *-> [/5 ■^ "3 — CO «3 ^ ■- °0 ^n — r- 00 "« --^ = CO •— ; CN o g - ^ ^ ^ .-i 13 c -o tn .2 = ^ to .2 « .2P « ^ t op o ■- 't ^ CQ c^ 3 CO od| 3 — r 1 O ._= CO op in CO ,_, v = 3 o T ^ CO -O — u-i NO O CO I N_^ ^ NO 00 ^C- On r^ « J, j^ « ^ ° 00^ ^2i >.^ E • E o U E^ ^ >> CO J> ^ L_ S Qi ^ x> I— V— u- co CO CO u u o "3 i 2 c s ^ 1 - - s " I *- >: > o w i. C > o b « 2 "S ^ ^ 03 U ■>, Cl ^ ^ ^ >. ■>. s 3 3 3 = ^0 O O O § § U ^^ ^ U CJ c § § -5 « « -2 xi X) •= .h .t h h: b S CO CO Ji CO CO cp ^ ^ _£;; O O Q Cu CU 00 00 c -o o CO — 00 /I, .E r CO > o '* -2 CO >H o c ^^ g ^ Z 00 3 .- el- 's E E ra _ CO 00^ o • E ^-< ^ ^ * A >. 00 ^ > OQ (U ■ ■ • ■ > S c ■;^ 3 3 ^ o o § u u o >- c Si, s: OS UJ Z UJ UJ Z UJ ^ ■^ Z <^ _ NO z 00 ^ U-i ON Qi ON oo CN co UJ iri in Cci Z > ON OO CN (^ 00 oo UJ UJ — Qi Z o in i— •o CO fl *^ >, 3 .ti -a U CO en ^^ _3> s.^ CO ■:! -^ UJ UJ Z o oo E NO 'E CO' — CO "" CO en <^ CO 3 ^^ *- •— ' « O ^ ^ CO ^ 00 ' -o a; -o ii o — °'E I .b u.' o 5 ^ UJ B 2 E O) — o c^ « o •S <» E — ■■ b a> u ^ f> c Q g o C *r" In O ^ 13 . . o c >^U 3 3 « CJ ^ O = Q O S NO CO OO UJ < Q 00 OO 0\ Qv 00 J 2 s ^ O — ro 00 IT) — z o < o §^ ^ m 00 -^ 00 <~^ _ m UJ LU uj on Z Z m so (N CT) C/D ro (N ^ C/D CA (N UJ UJ 1/-1 00 Z H E- ^ on 00 LU on z 13 .2 .a « O O a. c O § ^U c o I" UJ H on o c «^ e c c 3 - W — *^ "^ ' "vi OJ o 3 -^ o «« u -J 1:1 (U O c a> > 3 ^■^^ a3 4-^ 3 T3 CO C/J O =J ■—1 T3 '— ' cd iri rsi 1^ *; on ^ E 3 C = o • ^ 4) C -I I ° 2^ a. on 5 on 00 3 •a o UJ Ci = o (N _ -£ on ; _ cti «4- 00 _ o 3 CO' *i UJ ^' c 3 O c CO 'C 55 c 3 o O •o c _C0 CO o c 3 O O c o to _o >■ Si. I. s: b 5 CO E 3 -o CO N = O ^ g ■■^ 00 2 ^§ c >-, CO C > CO ^ s c CQ <: >^ -^ 3 o c o X3 c 3 O c o X3 3 -o CO ao c 'C Q. Q. o en z "3 1n -^ ■ = ■^ — -2 . CO — ^ _ f^ >^ CO r^ CO CO 30 % >% >^ >% k. 6c c c c c 3 3 3 3 1 000 U CJ u U 1- c c c c 000 ^ ^ ^ ^ J3 ^ l— l— u^ k« Vlj CO CO CO CO ■r. u u U I» >» a> t U 3 H 00 < o\ Q ON 1—- 5fl c k. 3 t3 s -J CQ •«— » o Z 'C o to Q < U '0 o Oi -J Ji ii (U j: ■- OS T3 — i Ml C/l ■ — I S O U I/) 5 .O O 5 ^ §:| o § c o (U CI. < o u (« 3 to 5 t 1/1 1/-1 iri in o\ o\ o^ as Q. o. a. Q. 00 On oo ON 30 3 On ITl ON 00 On 00 ON 00 00 00 00 00 On On <^ <^ '^ >. >> 00 ON 00 ON c oj u a> u v^ ^ ly^ ry^ "5 < ~B ■3 3 c 3 « « CO "5 "T S S S -== -^ -^ ON 00 c 3 3 O m m vo ~> 00 i—t ■— 1 (N ~> — (N (N (N r~- 00 — C C O 3 O 3 i« E 50 r^ .E .E 00 C2. _ _ 00 a a. n..E « ^ 1^ ^ Q. Q. CO o a: o o u^ ^ -0 4> 2 z z E E E in in ir, U — — — c c c c 3 3 3 3 0000 u u u u c c c c 0000 .£i X> X5 X> u u. u. u. cd CO CO CO o u o o § tu on UJ C/2 ^ m _3 T3 CO U -o CO U C 3 O 5 ^ « 3 T3 CO •T3 CO X! CO - ^-^ o o X) CO •J5 .X - > CO T •a c ^ o CO ^ 1^ .ti: T3 >. CO O O Oti o (J ^ Q. O H z V5 IZI 13 k- <*- o o a. o UJ on o O Z e-E 3 "O Z ' CO "^ -O TJ ■ — ^ CO O m rj o UJ >-. >^ >^ >N C = S 3 o o U 3 CO c 3 O u IS CO c 3 o c o U o CO o a: (U w Q U ^ ■ 3 o Jr. > >» a o 3 3 u u C/J O o >% u 3 00 o pa < 00 00 On OS 00 00 00 00 >> ^ O 00 ON On on CO C C s ^ D C 3 3 3 •— > — > 00 On r^ "" 00 00 >/-> (N — ,>,>, ON ^ c^ CO e^ 3 3 I S 2 S ^ CN CN — — rj r^ fS =0 c 'C 3 •a J CQ ■4-* u ■«-( Q CO < o 00 o o o CnJ o 00 z ^ O ^ ir^ C/5 NO z 1— 00 r~- C/D /^ H f- H Csl U >» "O "O 3 s 00 n u, i C ■r}-' * ^ ro e •o r k I 1^ >% C c %j 3 2 O '^ ^- > ^ t/l 3t O a: O 3 ^..^ -o r^ o Z Q. 3 -a c 3 O 3 CO 5 00 T3 UJ C o5 NO O CO >. ^^ ^-^ — -a Q. — 00 o W 3 o o "2 ^ u. S o o Z CO c CO ^ O CO 5-% „^ s - 1 -o CO X o Urn ^u '>, c 3 Q >. c 3 O O 13 TD V^ i a> .3i xi i: ^ 1-
  • T3 >, "^ — ' ■*-• C G CO ID O ^^ s <*- o O UJ C/3 z C/J r; (^ ^ ~ On' ON ^^ 3 O o U 3 CO O O 3 ^^ CO -^ -T3 = W « (U > I s = -a CQ ^ o ^ o E vi oo-g m (N •^ K CO O O 5 c c o o ^ >-• C c 3 3 O O u o >- c CO to CJ u- "a > 3 C~ T3 CO C So: apo •c ^ OO o •^ UJ i ^ '^E c c — § o 0(i UJ SD E 3 •o CO O T3 C" 3 CO 3 -o ^ -i CO 3 "3 CO -^ 3 ai c CO ' O rS «^ • - ^ o E iJ 00 -,^ E o Z 50 ,E ir, ^ a. no c/3 on 13 C CO OO "O a> CO o c =3 3 O E OO CJ 2 > CO L. o ^ ■ ■ c ^ 3 C CO X -a 3 ■!= S CJ -O OO ^ 00 ON H < Q (N o^ o o bC r^ 00 00 OO ^ ON O Q.O^ _ Q. a. w 3 -^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r- ON — U ttJ ^ ^ on on Z Z o i/^ o NO o o on in on Z in NO m CN — on 00 m on on on on Z W on C/3 UJ u U U r^ ULI UJ NO r- I'"! r— NO ■<^ NO NO 2222 Z 2 c/D on on on ^ o Z z On On On On in (N ON r<^ H H H H '^ H H H 1£ '■*-• Q. »n U OS ^ OS T3 ^ i ^ i s CC -o •o a 3 i; cs •o 3 «> 03 E « -^ S o ^^ CO >^ 00 00 ^ 5= c ^_^ omin pring Cuto o on "5 -a CO '5 > 3 lie, Wy GypS rshing 1 r CO ■vZ7 ^.^ COD. « X 00 T3 S3 O u- C o Ig (adult E of Fra 5miN mi S of 00 (deac mi E of c m <*- o c Z -o" r- > --So fHwy d 103, "e 00 U- O ne Road ked Cree Butte R( O CO r-~' O (^ Z Z ^ o ^ on. 00 r .— (N ^ I li 'E m E m ty: Pipeli ty: Crool y: Chalk nty: Hwy inty; Cou c 3 O u c c C C ♦-' rfield Coui sebud Cou 1 3 O U c o -e 3 O U c o -e rbon Cou rbon Cou rter Coun c o on _o ,c CO c« CO CC CC CO o 13 u u u u u u a oi >" o 00 i I i i i H II i i